Clare Luce, the first actress to play the role, received a detailed background explication from John Steinbeck himself. His letter explains that Curley's wife may appear hard and sexually predatory, but that it is mostly a defense. She is, he explains "a nice, kind girl and not a floozy" (SLL 154). We do not have a record of Luce's performance, so we cannot see for ourselves how she interpreted this woman who was called a "tart" and "jail-bait" by the men in the play, but "not a floozy" by her creator. We do, however, have records of her personification in three film productions and it is instructive to analyse them, not just for the amplification they provide for our interpretation of this problematic character, but also for what they tell us about the politics and psychology of the producers. Judith Crist once commented that when Hollywood makes a historical movie, it tells us more about Hollywood at the time of the making of the film than it does about the time period of the film plot.
