Teaching notes and materials for Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant
- 287 Ezra . . . had been his mother's eyes.
- 274 "Come closer so I can see your hair
- 271 For the first time, Ezra fully understood that she was blind."
- 259 "She's blind," her doctor said.
- 258 All she said carried references to sight.
- 213 We have a child in trouble here, don't you see that?"
- 182 She couldn't have said what it was she was looking for.
- 185 "Don't you see?" Cody had cried.
- 153 I see everything in your heart, Cody Tull!
- 109 He's nothing to me, don't you see?
- 05 memory seemed to be going blind with the rest of her.
"Cody Tull was too bitter about his childhood experiences to be able to see any of the positive aspects in Ezra's optimism. Pearl was much too narrow and inflexible in her nature to be able to see anyone else's point of view. . .
Study Questions
Negatives
|
Characteristic |
Novel: Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant |
Play: King Lear. |
|
Lead character |
Pearl |
Lear |
|
major fault |
blind to self, blind to others' needs and affection, rejection, misunderstanding |
blind to self, blind to others' needs and affection, exile, rejection, misunderstanding |
|
children |
Ezra, Cody, Jenny |
Cordelia, Goneril, Regen |
|
rejects favourite offspring |
Ezra |
Cordelia |
|
outcome |
dies unhappy, unbelieving, unaware? |
dies mad, despairing, self aware: "Pray now, foregt and forgive. I am old and foolish." |
|
agent of redemption |
Ezra |
Fool |
|
key symbols |
arrow, meal, |
letters, eyes, eyeball, weather, flowers |
|
metaphors and similes |
apple, apple |
blindness, foolishness, nothing, division |
|
truant |
parents |
derelict Ki ng, self indulgent king |
|
character development |
Pearl fails to ever see her children as other than extensions of her own insecurities; no redemption/ release/ resolution 'That's life!" but, the mistakes are worked out in the second generation |
Lear learns to become responsive to the needs and concern of someone else |
|
setting |
rigid boundaries at the door |
disordered divided kingdom |
|
subplots |
Luke and Slevin |
Gloucester, Edmund and Edgar |
Some notes for a profile of Ezra
Question: If Jenny's chief fault is flippancy (not taking important things seriously), Cody's is jealousy, power and competition, and Pearl's is sheer defensive negativity, unpredictability and impulsiveness, then what is Ezra's? What was the trademark flaw she saw in him?
Answer: Ezra and Pearl shared the same fault - low self esteem, insufficient self respect.They both suffered from a low sense of their own worth. They both seems to disregard themselves, not take care of themselves, not rate themselves by customary measures of worth.
Read from Hill, Thomas E. (1991) Self-respect reconsidered. pp. 19-24. Autonomy and Self-Respect Cambridge University Press:
"Basic respect as a human being does not need to be earned; and if respect is having proper regard for rights, then at least some respect is due each person without his needing to earn it. A person may lack self-respect not merely by underestimating his merits and achievements but also by misunderstanding and undervaluing his equal rights as a human being." (p. 19) Hill goes on, "at least part of a sense of one's own worth is having and living by personal standards or ideals that one sees as an important part of oneself." (23).
Here are some observations from a seminar at La Trobe University,
7 August 1994 led by philosopherTim Oakley:
Self Esteem Self Respect a global rating, takes in all sorts of features an evaluation of some aspects of personality and life personal estimation, private criteria conventional, public criteria counsellor psychologist: amorphous changing feeling Cooper-Smith 1967 Inventory
1. Low self evaluation is cognitive, is global, is a rating in particular respects (either moral behaviour, personal ideals, standards)
2. It has a conative aspect: the will to act on one's own behalf, such as in protecting one's agency, protecting one's rights, entitlements; confidence and determination.
Ezra shows a lack of this in not fighting Cody for Ruth. Is it a fault to be so self giving that you cannot become an individual?
3. The usual sources of self value are: personal traits, achievements, capacities, what we think we are, what we belong to.
Did Ezra not take time to measure his own progress, rate his own achievements, form an honest opinion of himself? Is it a fault to avoid doing so? Does he cope by avoiding any standards knowing that "Expectations will do you in in the end."
4. Effect of failures in self respect as in not meeting personal standards, ideals or others' or own moral standards
Is he working from (1) fixed standards (´ lowered self esteem) or (2) flexible standards (´ coping skills)?
How does Ezra score on these points? Does he suffer undue degrees of debilitation, timidity, underachievements, broken social relationships, etc. Yet he never goes to the brink of fatalism, despair. His self regulatory coping mechanisms unlike Jenny ( problems are unreal, merely misperceptions) Cody (rubbish the problems) Pearl (be blind to problems), Ezra copes with them heroically. He is unfazed, unhurt, powerless, with a servant-like passivity that just "gets through" anyway.
5. Why do we become worried about low self esteem in others? Does it embarrass us who have more of it? Does it make us feel powerless because quite often only the person himself can make it better for himself. Not to succeed in this is both a public and a private failure. Consider the effects of lowered collective self esteem, morale of the Tulls. Very often lowered self esteem correlates directly with identity/ social/ societal problems. If it is raised, then the problems will be managed directly rather than with more education/ health. welfare / employment/ housing assistance.
Homework: Write a letter to Ezra confirming his positives, suggesting ways to help him build up his self esteem and overcome his lack of assertiveness.
G. B. Smith 20/3/01
Ezra (67, 72, 117, 120, 153, 161,
172, 217, 266) Pearl's (14, 22, 153, 186, 202,
271, 285) Beck 289 Jenny 70, 109 Cody
228, 248, 244,133,200 his camera cruelty on Ezra 63
© G. B. Smith 2000 Page numbers the Penguin 1985
edition
All three Tull children are conscious of one another, are typical too.
"a trademark flaw in each of their lives."
TULL FAMILY REVISION some quotations to discuss 24/10/90
-In one instance Pearl says to Ezra about the offer of a partnership in the restaurant (p 94): ". . partnerships don't cost a dollar; you'll be beholden all your life. Ezra, we Tulls depend on ourselves, only on each other. We don't look to the rest of the world for any help whatsoever. How could you lend yourself to this?"
"I guess your family's enough for you. . Aren't we lucky to have each other?" Pearl would say to Cody (48).
Ezra thinks: "They say I'm pushy or . emotional . . I really honestly believe I missed some rule that everyone else takes for granted; I must have been absent from school that day" (125) The Tull children for instance suffered this lack of clear direction and had to make it on their own, so much so that Jenny remarks: "We made it didn't we? We did grow up. Why the three of us turned out fine."
Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant pages 184-5: "Pearl believes now that her family has failed. Neither of her sons is happy and her daughter can't seem to stay married. There is no one to accept the blame for this but Pearl herself . . Still sometimes she has the feeling that it's simply fate, and not a matter for blame at all. She feels that everything has been assigned, has been preordained; everyone must play his role. Certainly she had never intended to foster one of these good son/bad son arrangements."
page 109: "Was this what it came to - that you never could escape? That certain things were doomed to continue, generation after generation? . . She continued to feel fragile though. She went on guarding a trembly, fluid center. . . She would remind herself to draw back, to loosen hold. It seemed to her that the people she admired had this in common: they gazed at the world from a distance. There was something sheeted about them - some obliqueness that made them difficult to grasp."(212)
© G. Smith 1990, 2000
This page can be accessed again from: http://home.pacific.net.au/~greg.hub/dinner.html
© G. B. Smith 1999, Revised 10/3/01