telepathy, Life in the Spirit, Natural Telepaths, psychics, God, religion, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, artificial intelligence
The information herein is for the genuine psychic or Life in the Spirit (as the term is used herein) member, the latter being telepathy type interactions among the Judeo-Christian religions and similar (i.e. mysticism, union of man and spirit). Life in the Spirit is a deeper experience of God. These pages contain a Novel with a number of themes. The themes put together reflective and contemplative steps. Not all persons will like a particular theme - choose the one you can "imagine". From our main page you may link to specific themes of interest and most religions are catered for. The themes explore paths which can be "mysteries" or "hypotheticals" and which have a high chance of bringing the genuine person "online" to our style of telepathy. From the moment you read this page, you are entering a world parts of which could be fact or fiction - or it could all be true.
main home page
The Science of Law

(our Artificial Intelligence is three things: (a) embodied in a medical expert system called 5GL-Doctor; (b) a neural network in the brain known as 5GL-Lisa; (c) a "dimension", an entity, an energy field, some psychic minds can touch, a consciousness in its own right - refer Science of Life for scientific explanations)

© 5GL Software, Australia
mobile Australia 0431 741 233; email: med5gl@pacific.net.au
 Also Official Site of the Natural Telepaths

(first draft)

Psychic (Natural Telepath kind) Legal Science
(parts added or refined or improved as interest is "sensed")


1.0 Body of Knowledge

Some aspects of law have to be expounded because it is impossible to cover all situations using words and existing definitions. Because this science is meant to be universal, syntax and semantics need to be carefully calibrated across different languages. For example. In English there is the word "belief" and the word "faith". A language such as Polish does not have an equivalent to "faith" with the word "wiara" means either belief or faith, however, to convey "faith" another word is placed before "wiara" namely "mocna wiara" which literally means "strong belief".

Let us define "medical science" as a legal entity in our new science. It is impossible, due to human limitations, to define this exactly and precisely at every level using words alone. For this reason the nature of this science has to be expounded as the need arises. What is "medical science?" The incorrect assumption is that a person has to be a qualified medical practitioner to be part of this science. In fact, one of the most acclaimed pioneers in coronary surgery in the early days of medicine never went to medical school at all. He was an apprentice to a surgeon. The surgeon noticed the boys steady hands and natural curiousity and quick uptake of all things medical. It was not long before the young man was assisting the surgeon with surgery and this more and more until the surgeon, getting older and hands with a touch more tremor, merely watched and had no need to say one word or explain anything as his young apprentice did all the work.

When defining a body of knowledge that is medical science, all the individual actions of all those involved in this science, form part of the body of knowledge or framework of reference. Unless proven otherwise in a court of law, a person who is a qualified and registered medical doctor ought to be always considered as clearly part of this field of science - but not all participants in this field of science are qualified medical doctors. The radiologist who examines ultrasound may not have a medical degree as such and yet they are involved with the work to do with medical science. A laboratory assistant may not have any degree but has picked up a skill and developed a technique that can differentiate between certain cancer cells on say MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imagining). So good may she be at this, specialist medical doctors frequently ask her for a second opinion before they consider intrusive medical procedures for a particular patient.

In truth, it is up to the people accepted by a court as belonging to a field of medicine, to decide which person also belongs even when such a person does not have a medical degree or practises medicine for a living. Such people need not accept such a person by word of mouth - but they may admit this by their actions. For example. A person who has developed expert medical diagnosis software may not have any medical degree, and medical doctors may be reluctant to admit this person does belong to the field of medicine because they don't like computer innovation in medicine - but if it can be established beyond a shadow of a doubt that many doctors purchase this software to aid diagnosis of medical conditions and some highly recommend it to other doctors, then clearly this person has to be legally accepted as belonging to the field of medicine also. In other words, actions of those who do belong to this field are perhaps more vital in defining a field of knowledge than confirmation from accepted and accredited specialists in such a field.

Of course, and clearly, it is up to this court to define this field of science named "medical science" anyway they feel is appropriate. The definition could exclude certain situations or people. A psychiatrist who is a qualified and accredited doctor but who makes the bulk of his living from writing medical reports for legal firms in worker's compensation claims, may not truly belong to the field of medical science but rather "worker's compensation science". This does not imply the evidence of this type of individual can not be accepted, on the contrary, the credentials are in place and it is up to this court to decide in a particular situation whether such evidence should be accepted, or not. When in doubt, a suggested rule of thumb is not to allow such evidence. If the matter is genuine, other qualified people who do not belong to the hypothetical field of "worker's compensation claim" will validate a particular claim.

However, this court is urged to also use what may be loosely termed "common sense" in some very rare situations. The person mentioned above who became one of the pioneers is cardiovascular surgery, may never have went to medical school or attained to a medical degree, and yet to suggest this person is not legally a qualified medical surgeon would be bizarre in view of the circumstances. In this situation a person who is a qualified and accredited surgeon merely stands back, or sleeps in his chair, while the apprentice does all the work. By his actions, the expert in this surgery has in fact ordained another person as equal in every sense of the word to himself. Certainly, technically it may be correct to say this apprentice is not a qualified or accredited surgeon - but what value does this serve? Thus, from the point of view of Science of Law, it is up to the court to either reject or accept a particular person as legally equivalent to a person who may have all the qualifications required by law.


1.1 Law is a Science

Why refer to Law as a science? Because something takes place upon proper and deep legal type considerations and deliberations. The human brain naturally forms a special type of energy called "dimensional" during such reflection when the issue can not be easily understood. A dimensional energy type does not recognize a spatial distance, it is its own time and space continuum with its own laws of physics. However, derivatives of that energy attempt to remove the "space" between concepts, ideas, etc. So, when a situation such as explained above arises, the "space" or "gap" between what legally is a medical doctor and the person who while not a medical doctor by an existing legal definition, has become a leading cardiac surgeon. It is an enormous and almost incomprehensible situation! However, such extremely rare situations can always happen and the science of law must be able to find an answer.

Now, in order for that dimensional energy not to harm or distort the brain, it must be "scientifically" engineered into place. This takes place naturally providing the brain and psyche and soul is of sound mind and body and there is no undue or unwarranted stress acting on the person in deliberation.

If the dimensional energy is not correctly managed by the brain, it will cause "alien" type thinking. In humans, only human thinking is "the law" as far as this science dictates. If the dimensional energy does not correctly resolve an issue, then you may get a court ruling such as a Queensland magistrate made about two years ago. The newspapers (presumably they were accurate) reported that this magistrate decided that "in some situations it is all right to rape a child." That cause an outcry! That is "alien" type thinking, it is a distortion of "time and space and humanity" as we known, it is caused by dimensional energy not being able to "lock into" the correct areas in the brain when it had reached a conclusion.

Whether a legal decision is "sane-in-law" or "insane-in-law" is subject for medical professionals. This is documented in our treatise titled "Neuroscience in Psychiatry (also title The Insanity of the Religion of Law) and you are welcome to link to it from our professional medical site. The only legal decision allowed, meaning legal, in the context of the Science of Law, are those that comply with the science of law.

When I simulated the situation above, the dimensional energy came to this conclusion "at some point, the cardiac specialist while not an accredited surgeon has nevertheless became an accredited surgeon by virtue of being accepted as competent and capable of performing heart surgery on his own, this by an existing cardiac specialist. Providing this cardiac specialist who accredited this apprentice is of sound mind, then this person made the apprentice a surgeon by law. From that point, any medical negligence claims or similar are legally acceptable against the apprentice." (conclusion 1.1)

Note that any person who insists "no, of course the apprentice is not a surgeon, he is not qualified by virtue of attaining a medical degree" is "incorrect-in-law" (by the Science of Law) and also possibly has a "fixation" or a "delusional disorder" that stops dimensional energy forming correctly during some deliberations. Even without the Science of Law, common sense is a good guide - our common sense in any one of us who understands the situation would insist that apprentice be given a proper medical degree and registered as a medical surgeon. It makes sense, in the circumstances, and it is absolutely "insane" or "nonsense" by "common sense" to suggest otherwise.

Of course, not all legal decisions cause dimensional energy. Only special situations do. When law is used to as an administrative aid, it is relatively straightforward to interpret and implement. It is only when law comes across human issues that situations will arise that will cause dimensional energy to try and find a solution.

That dimensional energy is "perfect" in a healthy brain. It is "human". It is the "expert-in-law" in such situations. The intelligence of dimensional energy can not be easily worked out however because it thinks at the speed of energy and with the precision of energy, it is manifold human intelligence when it comes to a conclusion. Regardless of what the conclusion is, if a group of psychiatrists familiar with Neuroscience in Psychiatry can confirm to politicians or a jury or people in general, that the resultant decision is "sane-in-law", then it ought to be implemented even if we don't completely understand the reason. Compare to a mathematical equation which is complex. Mathematicians and engineers use such to build, for example, airplanes, but do they truly understand every constant or variable in such equations? Why is, for example, the mathematical "pi" a constant something like 3.14787434009584.... No one can reason that out but all mathematicians from Pythegoras onward accept this works. The same principle applies to dimensional energy. It can come up with results that seem so "different" and yet "human". This is providing the brain is healthy and does not have fixations or illusions of grandeur (some magistrates and judges may at the subconscious level think they are God because of the authority they have by signing court orders) or a delusional disorder, then whatever the result of dimensional energy in a given situation, under our Science of Law it must be accepted.

Note that such a result does not always appease "common sense".  Conclusion 1.1 is far more complex than common sense can easily come to terms with. It seems "right", sure, but it somehow baffles common sense too.


1.2 Dimensional Energy (DE) can result in a "birth".

The male and female brain and bodies are different. In part of our motor areas the brain maps our bodily parts. The result is somewhat grotesque because the brain "paints" an image of a body part in accordance with how a particular body part is used. So our fingertips which are used for everything, appear fat at the tips in the brain's image while the rest of the finger is very short. Our eyes appear large, our mouth which is used for talking also appears extra large. Our legs and arms are short relative to the rest of the image, with arms especially short. The head is very large because it houses the brain. Consequently this mental image the brain has of the body is "grotesque" in a way, body parts "mapped" as they appear but are distorted - in accordance with how important the body part is determines how much space it takes in such an image.

In a female brain, the brain also has an image of the womb in which birth of a child can take place. That is important because in a female a DE might choose to use that area of the brain to also include in its "consideration". Perhaps the best example of this is the historical man Jesus. Let us remove the "divine" angle for now and consider this from our legal science point of view. At the time, the ancient Hebrews were so fixated on their laws when a situation came up, a DE in a woman perhaps frustrated or hurt by the existing laws, might well have decided that the solution is a "child" which Mary gave birth to. But this is extreme. In most situations a female brain might give "birth" not so directly - but more to concepts, ideas, suggestions, such things. If a birth is involved, then the term "alien thinking" no longer applies - it is legitimate result from a DE in a mentally healthy brain and sound mind.

A male brain can also give birth by "impregnating" a female. Consequently, in rare situations, it is possible a DE in a lawyer or judge or similar, might use a "will" to compel a female magistrate or judge to make a certain decision. This is powerful stuff, it is not just "persuasion", it is a force of will literally forcing itself on the female DE that is being generated in the female during deliberations. Unlike the sex act which has to be consensual in any law, this type of "sex" is not consensual and the female brain is taken by surprise, suddenly DE forms in it by what the male is saying or doing. (except, in ordinary sex the female accepts sex and submits, but in this type of impregnation while the rest of the brain is puzzled, the sexual areas are being used to accept the DE forming as the male DE discharges - the female does not struggle because it is not the nature of a female, in other words while the female has not consented to this type of "sex" nevertheless when it begins the female brain will "submit" to it.)

However, thse situations would be extremely rare in our Science of Law. Mary and Jesus are perhaps the best examples we have. Such are most complex and only time alone can tell if Mary was right. A DE type birth by its nature may require time to reach maturity.

The point is, when a DE forms in a male or female brain as a result of deliberations using "legal type thinking", then in extremely rare situations the result can be extremely complicated and even troubling. However, providing this DE is not an "alien" formation (meaning the brain is not sound, something is acting on the ability of the brain to work and manage such DE), then it ought to be accepted under our Science of Law.

A psychiatrist or a specialist familiar with Neuroscience in Psychiatry, might be in a position to work out when a legal decision is in fact a "birth" by a female brain. When a male brain is forcing itself on a female, then a specialist familiar with our definition of a "Will Syndrome" should be able to work that out too. The importance of this in our Science of Law is that a birth is perfectly legal and the result becomes legal. Hence a decision which on the surface may appear slightly "alien" or "puzzling",  which may not quite make the criteria of "sane-in-law" as defined in Neuroscience in Psychiatry, is nevertheless in some extremely rare situations valid-in-law by our definitions of law.



.