© 5GL Software, Australia Chapter from Clinical Manual of Psycholegalanalysis (A new medical science proposed by 5GL Software. The clinical manual contains the diagnosis criteria for what are termed "conclusions" in regards to certain acts of lawyers or judges or magistrates or police. These have come about using the process of psychoanalysis and the main input the Alzheimer's Scam report. They are highly specific diagnosis. This chapter is one of the Appendices.)

Animal-Humans and Humans


An animal human is defined as the person whose brain is not capable of forming a human mind.

5GL-Lisa (explained in treatise) projects three states of brain/mind:

1.    The body and brain part of the same biological organism.
2.    The human mind is a transparent structure in the image of the brain with walls and pendulums and other structures. The structure forms from the activity in the brain but is not related directly to any area of activity.
3.    When mind closes, an oval shaped magnetic-like field across the brain forms which compels neural networks to rewire or to prepare an area of the brain to learn new information or skill. This is the only “superficial mind” the animal-human is capable of.

A rough estimate is that 9 out of 10 people are animal-humans.

The intelligence of a human and animal-human is exactly the same. Further, it follows that in rare cases the brain of the animal-human will awaken to the deficiency of the mind and will condition itself to in fact reproduce – or even improve on! - many of the higher functions of the human mind.

Subject to the natural individual differences of course, the physical appearance of an animal-human and human is exactly the same.


The reason for these labels is only for the purpose of a medical diagnosis, or to assist healing, using this new science. Example:


a)    A “human soldier” with a post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). According to this science, such is likely to be the result of the war situation and not repressed memories of childhood or negative experiences in childhood. Psychoanalysis is not appropriate. Just talking over the philosophy of war and conflicts, the fact that the world has walls whether we like it or not and armies are important and conflicts arise, ought to balance the ego.

b)    On the other hand, in the animal human soldier with PTSD thought to have been brought about by a conflict or war situation, then regardless of what took place, this ought have no impact on the natural animal brain – hence if PTSD develops, this is likely to do with what Freud described as the unfinished business of childhood. Psychoanalysis is appropriate.


Assume that general duties police and general soldiers are without exception animal-humans. The id senses the young brain as lacking the capacity to form a human mind, and the id compels such a person to become police or soldier.  Within an estimated 2 years, the brain in such a person is conditioned and becomes a natural animal brain. (Note that psychologists who have studied soldiers, as I recall these were United States findings, have found their IQ typically around 75.)

Note that not all animal-humans join the police forces. It is those who are “compelled” to join, these are the ones in whom the id had decided long ago that the brain (and person) is better off by reverting back to a natural animal brain. These people can not help but try and join the forces. This “compulsion” is likely to run in the family.

Note that not all soldiers or police are animal-humans. In some countries there is conscription. Or, a clever military add, say with a young female soldier with long legs and brief skirt, may interest impressionable young “human” males full of hormones to join the army.

So, assume all are, but keep an open mind because sometimes this will not be the case.

The use of the term “animal-human” is not warranted outside a clinical situation and if used then solely under a medical oath and solely for the purpose of therapy.

We believe, completely, that if you need to explain to a police officer or soldier (who is your patient; perhaps someone with PTSD) that you suspect their brain is what is known as “animal–human brain” in one medical science – they will appreciate you! At first such may not like it, but then will because they will know you understand them. The brain will be “content” with you, even if the person is not so keen on that word, and will cooperate perhaps against the wishes of the person.

It is likely police detectives are commonly animal-humans (but usually with a high intelligence; but not necessarily an exceptionally  high IQ). This assumption is based on the fact that, from research, police detectives appear to avoid investigating crimes by psychopaths like the plague! Such find these baffling, with the psychopath having an agenda of their own. This is consistent with an animal-human brain that can not relate to the human mind when it is twisted (as in a psychopath, and note that it is unlikely any psychopath is an animal-human. However, a person with a Will Syndrome may come across as a psychopath but in fact may be  an animal-human). On the other hand, the animal-human brain readily relates to the vast majority of crimes not acceptable in society. The more natural the state of that brain (i.e. the natural animal brain), the sharper it would be (in theory) in matters to do with finding the offenders. [It follows, ideally, hypothetically, that the most senior detectives ought to have a true natural animal brain].

It is likely army officers at senior levels are all humans. The logic being that military strategy, while may seem like a game to the ordinary person, requires a complex mind. While an animal-human can, often, learn to do with the brain what the mind does in the human, nevertheless such a brain is likely to be “impetuous”, wanting to get a job over and done with and prepared to only “half plan” an operation (due to the fact such is eager to get the mission over and done with; most of the brain is compelling itself to just do – its a natural animal brain, it does not plan as such in the same way that humans plan, it prefers to do, that is what it craves, action not planning). The human mind, on the other hand, restrains the brain from being too eager to begin something the mind has not completed studying. It is highly unlikely, for these reasons, that an animal-human would get too far in the army in the sense of promotions (could go quite high, true, but never the top echelons of command or planning.)

It is most unlikely any air force pilot is animal-human. High technology is not what the natural animal brain is naturally into. The closer to nature, the more content the natural animal brain is. (But, clearly, if the air-force generates sexy ads this may attract highly intelligent animal-humans also. The animal-human may have better reflexes and response times than the human, however, such may be reluctant to join the air-force because they have a natural aversion to any high technology such as a fighter jet has). This does mean an animal-human does not desire to learn to use a mobile telephone or Internet, that is because there is little choice in this matter nowadays – but there is a choice whether one wants to fly high technology jets or not.

It is unlikely lawyers who are animal-humans could ever get too far in the judicial system. Most of the upper legal decisions require the human mind. On the other hand, due to the fact that the animal-human brain does not have a conscience in the same way that humans do, such a lawyer might  be very successful because they may have no ethics or morals in how they go about winning a case. (Example: if a human receives a letter and is asked in a court if she or he had received it, they would say yes. On the other hand, an animal-human may say yes only if the letter had been sent registered mail else he would deny it when this was not convenient to admit. A natural state of mind causes this, this is not exactly lying as far as the brain is concerned - even though it comes across as such to an observer.]