Applying Artificial Intelligence © 5GL Software, Australia Addendum to the report about what might be an established “legal scam” to defraud family members of the rights to property of Alzheimer’s victims December 2008 You, the reader, are the jury. This addendum is intended for a jury to consider what enhancements or alterations, if any, a jury would make to the Last Will and Testament of Mrs J White if you were Mrs J White and were suddenly made aware of what had transpired since you became ill with dementia most likely Alzheimer’s type.

DISLCLAIMER: the actual names of the people referred to as "White" in this report are confidential and please don't try to extrapolate from any other information on this web site what the actual names are. Also note that the reports I have explain my personal point of view which may be flawed due to limited facts available to me about other matters or issues surrounding what I call the "Alzheimer's Scam". For example. I could be completely wrong about the motive of Mr R White. Under stress, he may have suddenly panicked thinking his mother had made another Last Will and Testament (before she became ill with dementia) and leaving him out of it, and that may have been the true deep motive for all that followed. Please appreciate that there could be other equally plausible and persuasive points of view. My reports are not intended with any "malice" but to "educate" and alert people to what appears as a scam (my word for all this.) In fact, in order to protect the true names of the people involved, some "disinformation" has been placed in various sections of the web pages suggesting "names" but such may be only for the purpose of disinformation in order to protect the true identify of the people involved.

December 2008


You, the reader, are the jury. This addendum is intended for a jury to consider what enhancements or alterations, if any, a jury would make to the Last Will and Testament of Mrs J White if you were Mrs J White and were suddenly made aware of what had transpired since you became ill with dementia most likely Alzheimer’s type.



Motive of Mr R White

I put it to the jury Mr R White’s motive was not, in the beginning, to defraud Mr A White of his mother’s estate once she passed away.

After living for years now with a person who was loosing touch with reality, who had become heavily incontinent, the stress build up in Mr R White became too much. It turned to hate, hate of his mother and her son Mr A White who felt it was time their mother was placed in a nursing home.

Mr R White set on a plan to punish both Mrs J White and Mr A White for caring for his mother and liking being with her. In 2003 and 2004, Mr A White applied to Centrelink to become her full time carer and was accepted. This too infuriated Mr R White who now felt he was being told he was inadequate in looking after his mother.

In an extremely stressful situation like this, there is no one simple motive that can cover or explain all that took place. Deep buried emotions began to surface in Mr R White, repressed emotions and feelings. By this time he could not stand his mother because of her condition and the anxiety this caused in him about leaving her alone, at the same time deep repressed feelings of love for her were resurfacing. Hence this hate, also pumped by deep buried feelings of love, turned into an obsession, a delusion, that he has to protect his mother from everyone, that everyone else was evil and had to be disposed off, and any means to achieve this was legal in his frustrated mind.

However, instead of feelings, let us use intellect, reason, and logic, to put the events into perspective.

At the court hearing that took place some 9 months after the interim AVO was granted, Mr R White said in the witness stand that he had never set foot in Blacktown Court, the very court from which the AVO came from. This implies Mr R White had used a legal firm to arrange this AVO. If this is correct, then the only conclusion we can logically make is that his action of pretending to fall and call police claiming he was assaulted, were premeditated and well planned and executed, and he already had a legal firm that may have already provided him advice how to go about isolating his mother from her first-born son.

Another probably motive was to hide the fact that Mr R White was prone to violent rages and may have been abusing his mother during such times. Personally, I don’t believe this is the case but under duress of this kind I do not know what to believe and some facts have stuck in my mind. At the actual court hearing Mr R White was asked why he had taken his mother to a new dentist recently and not to the usual dentist. No reply from Mr R White however as any medical doctor would confirm, when a frail elderly is suddenly being dragged off to a different doctor or dentist, that is a sign of likely physical or emotional abuse of such a person.

That Mr R White was prone to violent rages, not that I personally have ever seen such but again under such duress I do not know what his actions could be or that they can be foreseen, can be inferred from the transcript of the actual court hearing. When asked why he vandalised Mr A White’s room in his mother’s house, even smashing a television into thousands of pieces, Mr R White had no reply.

I put it to the jury that Mr R White’s actions were in fact the unconscious acting out something horrible that Mr R White had seen when a child, namely his own father smashing up a house in a fit of rage and the television set in particular. This led to a divorce between Mrs J White and Mr J White, however, the young R White repressed this and possibly hated his mother for this divorce too. Feelings of love and hate go hand in hand in stress situations, hard to anticipate what the outcome of the mix can lead to.

Mr A White was always informed, by a solicitor, that the only possible reason for his mother being on the AVO as a “protected person”, was because Mr R White was living with her. What nonsense! The whole point of the AVO was to punish Mrs J White by isolating her from her son Mr A White and this would also put the grandchildren off so in fact she was also isolated from the grandchildren she adored. The proof of this the jury can work out from an incident at Maryflower Nursing Home, Westmead, A Uniting Church Care nursing home. While Mr A White was with his mother, Mr R White walked in on him and screamed “you breached an AVO now you will go to prison.” Mr A White left to be followed by Mr R White with what looked like a knife in his hand. That fear that it was a knife was enough to report Mr R White to Campbelltown police – much later Mr A White was arrested by Parramatta Police and charged with violating an AVO. What had the AVO got to do with Mrs J White and a nursing home? No one can answer that question. Nursing homes are under federal legislation not state as the AVO was, that too remains a riddle. In addition, Mr A White was arrested also after the AVO had expired which also does not make sense because that, as far as I can see, is illegal and unlawful arrest.

It is highly likely Mr R White began spreading malicious lies about his brother. With the AVO in his hand, it is probable he explained to the Director of the Maryflower Nursing home something like “look, my mother does not want to know Mr A White, he abused her physically, and that is the reason I have this AVO and she is a protected person.” That is about the only explanation that fits two facts namely: who told Mr R White that Mr A White was with his mother at the nursing home? Was it a chance coincidence that Mr R White walked in on his brother? That is ever so unlikely and possibly the Director of that Nursing Home was the one who telephoned Mr R White that his brother was with his mother. This would also explain why this director wrote a letter to Mr A White saying he could visit his mother anytime but then added, “I spoken to your mother and she does not want to see you.’

Now, Mrs J White only knew her son by a Polish name so she would not have any understanding who the director was talking about – secondly, she had not see him for two years because of this AVO and she had Alzheimer’s, which means she had limited memory and probably did not know who her son was until she saw him. People with Alzheimer’s forget their own siblings, that is the biggest hurt of that particular mental disease.

In the circumstances, I put it to the jury that Mrs J White’s Last Will and Testament ought to be amended to give $10,000 each to her grandchildren, from Mr R White’s portion, as punishment for causing so much pain and stress to Mr A White’s family and others such knew.

I also ask the jury to allow the house to be sold and the money split accordingly. As a person who has formulated a new medical science documented on my professional medical web pages, I do not believe at this point in time Mr R White has any chance of being normal again if he remains in that house. If he leaves, in time, as far as I can work this out from a new type of psychiatry, he ought to recover completely and perhaps again be able to re-establish family ties with his brother and his nephews and nieces.

Now, ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I also ask you to find magistrate (name) of Blacktown Court in 2004  who signed that interim AVO as guilty of not only endangering the life of Mrs J White, but also of gross criminal negligence. This magistrate had signed a court order without talking to the other parties concerned which means he did not have all the facts before him or her. The person whom he isolated not only had Alzheimer’s, she could barely walk, and if she fell she could not lift herself up. To isolate her family from such a woman, without making sure a properly qualified nurse is appointed by the court to replace the frequent and regular long stays by Mr A White with his mother, is a most disgusting act of criminal negligence I can think of.

It is also important, I believe, for this jury to set a precedent because this could happen to anyone. How a person under enormous stress behaves and what they do, is unpredictable perhaps even by the finest of psychiatrists. Anyone of you in a similar situation might be faced with the same problems Mr A White and his family was faced with – his excellent reputation smeared, he was threatened with imprisonment if he saw his mother, then arrested for seeing his dying mother in a nursing home – seriously, either we have sanity-in-law or, as the Alzheimer’s Scam report and this addendum proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, that insanity has triumphed over sanity in this situation.