High Time for the Medical Professionals To Take Charge of
Dementia/Alzheimer's Cases
March 2009
The Alzheimer's Scam report should persuade any sensible medical professional
that it is high time the issue was put completely in the hands of competent
medical professionals.
You may think in your country there are bodies that attempt to protect the
victim and families from blatant fraud. You may be very wrong! Consider
Australia. It has a Guardianship Tribunal which is supposedly there to protect
fraud against families of Alzheimer's victims - in my experience, they aid
it! In fact, from my research, when this tribunal in 2005 was asked to call
about twelve family witnesess to explain why an Alzheimer's victim ought
never be put in the hands of one particular son, this tribunal refused to
call any such witnesses.
Typically such a tribunal may be staffed by a lawyer and two intellectuals.
For all their good intentions, intellectuals have their own ideas about what
is the best thing to do. No matter how incontinent, no matter how disabled,
no matter how often left alone, such a tribunal may be convinced "always best
to leave person at home not place in nursing home."
The consequences of this are immense stress and worry of sincere members
of family, while those who may be psychopaths (growing disorder in society;
as is financial greed) or into drugs or other expensive enterprises, may
take this opportunity to begin stealing the wealth of the person to themselves.
A simple court order can do this trick as our Alzheimer's Scam report demonstrates.
Lies can be invented about anything. A genuine Last Will and Testament can
be hidden and the schemer goes to a hospital doctor and explains there is
no will so please write a report that this person has "testament capacity"
else most of the estate will go to the government.
In short, there is no end to scams that can be engineered.
In addition, a person who may have a borderline psychiatric condition can
go over the edge and begin scheming against other family members.
The mental status examination in my experience are meaningless with Alzheimer's
patients. Absolutely ridiculous in fact! Spend two days with such a person
and you now what they are like - no memory of what they said one minute ago;
will believe anything and sign anything; has no idea they are incontinent
or have anything wrong with their brain and mind. And yet such a person can
pass such a mental exam on a "good day"! The stress all this can cause on
sincere family members can be immense. The responsibility of when such a
person needs a nursing home ought to be solely in the hands of a caring and
experienced medical tribunal who is not interested in any aspects of law
but to do the best by the victim and family.
The whole idea of a mental status examination for dementia victims is bizarre
- the brain itself is destroyed, which means it is not the same brain as
when sound. Which areas of the brain do the mental status exams target? This
no one even understands and yet without such an understanding and appropriate
imaging to understand brain activity, the whole notion of mental status examinations
for dementia patients ought to be banned. It is not scientific or sound thinking.
In my opinion, about the only person who might, just might, be able to determine
how competent a dementia victim is mentally, is an experienced and competent
psychiatrist using the theory of psychoanalysis.