On the 5th day of June 2003 I, Theodore J. Rout, of 21/A Currong Flats, Currong St., Braddon ACT 2612

being duly sworn make oath (or affirm) and say as follows;

"If we're right; first we get the Noble Prize!" These were the words of the Promo spoken by Michael Murphy Phd student. He knew and so too did the ABC Catalyst producers of the significance and importance of being 1st. They know the worth of being 1st to publish. And knew the worth of my profound achievement of having proven the speed of light is alterable and controllable, so they knew they were presenting others as being 1st by omitting me publicly from being 1st.  

So they should be due to being 1st is a major driving force locally, nationally and worldwide. Being 1st by getting an Oscar and 1st in the Olympic Games and the getting of Gold is motivating the world of athletics leading up to Athens 2004 Games. Being 1st in the Fifa World soccer cup is also an admission of the importance of being 1st to the world public. Being 1st to land on the moon was of profound importance in the space race and it was an historical achievement by Sir Edmund Hillary with his being 1st to the summit of Mt Everest. Herb Elliotts’ being 1st to break the 4 minute mile enthralled Australians with pride. So there is no excuse for the Supreme court judiciaries’ down playing of the significance, the importance and worth of my being 1st to prove the speed of light is alterable and controllable which is a major part of a much larger body of scientific work and achievements of mine. The Supreme court and its’ judicial outcome of my justified attempt to stop the Media crediting others rather than me with being 1st to prove the speed of light is alterable and controllable in the publics’ mind is criminally obscene. The Free Press Media freely and criminally dumps News and Information that’s in the Australian and World publics’ interest into the garbage and freely blacklists citizens and has criminally blacklisted me. The ABC had the opportunity to fulfill their obligation and responsibilities to the public and publish my

- 1 -

Filed By: Theodore J. Rout Phone: (02) 6257-5438

Address: 21/a Currong Flats, Currong St Braddon, ACT, 2612

proof the "speed of light is alterable and controllable" prior to the 29th Aug 02 hearing, at and ever since. This proves their criminality, Free Press hypocrisy and malice towards me.

The blacklisting of citizens was internationally recognised as a criminal act through the blacklisting of American citizens during the McCarthyism period of the l950s. So a known criminal act is being committed against me by the Media blacklisting me and my achievements of my being 1st.

The courts are supposed to respond to evidence. But the courts' extreme prejudice in favour of the "Rich and Powerful and the Media" by the overriding of the evidence and the reasons why I was in court by the Supreme Courts' Judiciary "obstructing and perverting the course of justice" by their supplanting of the hearing to being about money and the empowerment of the "Rich and Powerful and the Media" with deep pockets to oppress the "Poor and Powerless and my" means by removing and subjugating of our right to, and need to, protect ourselves through preventing the suppression, violations and damage by the "Rich and Powerful and the Media" with "Injunctions before the fact".   

Questions need to be asked and answered: What are the ABC lawyers doing in court

obstructing and suppressing the broadcasting of my proof of 1998 that "the speed of light is alterable and controllable"? And about broadcasting suspect data from a suspect Quasar object that was stated was not credible by one of the scientists involved in the Catalyst program, a Dr Lineweaver. I didn't come into court to stop their broadcasting of the Catalyst program but to stop their plagiarising of my being 1st and their bestowing being 1st upon others.

Following is my proof of April 1998 that the speed of light is alterable up or down and it demonstrates and proves my intellectual and scientific superiority by my using data sitting before the eyes of the world science establishments for 50 years........."PROOF: It is proven and accepted that the faster you move through space the slower time passes. If time passes in a high speeding space at half the rate on Earth and the speed of light doesn't slow down in line with the slower time then its' speed is doubled relative to the slower time".......So answer the question: Has the speed of light halved or doubled? It having remained unaltered is not an option!....... It’s either altered down or up, so choose!

4th June 03. The spacecrafts' electric clock would move in slower motion due to the slower electrons that are subject to the speed of light and are not subject to Time. Einstein has made "TIME relative to MASS" and as the mass of the spacecraft (matter) increases due to the increased speed then time slows. This makes time subject to matter which is subject to the speed of light because Energy = "MASS" x the speed of light squared. This makes Time relative to the speed of light which proves that the speed of light has slowed in the fast moving spacecraft causing time, matter and energy to move in slower motion. Einstein has made time the variable and the speed of light a constant speed of 300,000 kps allowing him to alter the speed of light by altering time. This proves the Speed of light is alterable within Einsteins relativity and maintains the credibility of his E=MC squared. I proved Einsteins' Special relativity is Law in 1993, but the Media criminally refuse and fail to publish it.

"Why" are the ABC and the Media usurping, consequently PLAGIARISING, the originality,

- 2 -

ingenuity, creativity, the achievements and enormous credibility of my perceiving and evidencing in 1990-2 and the proving in 1998 that the speed of light is alterable and controllable and criminally present interloping mediocrity as being 1st in the publics' mind by omitting me and the suppressing of my proofs from public awareness, locally, nationally and internationally?

"Why" doesn’t the criminal Free Press that freely blacklists me and citizens and freely dumps news and information that's in the Australian and World publics' interest into the garbage that inevitably leads to, and produced this conflict, just publish, print and broadcast my proof of 1998 that the speed of light is alterable and controllable in my name and I as 1st? That was the problem and is the solution and resolution of the plagiarism committed by the ABC Catalyst program and other Media outlets. This conflict is their creation by their suppression of scientific proofs and scientific achievements of mine. To maintain and continue their criminal blacklisting of me then they inevitably require to commit further crimes against me and the public worldwide by committing plagiarism, by omitting me and my achievements

from public awareness and presenting others as 1st instead of me.

The Media to present persons publicly of having won gold medals at the Olympic Games that were won by others through their being 1st would be a crime of usurpation of abilities and achievements which is the act and crime of plagiarism. For the Media in doing this form of act to me makes the ABC and the Media plagiarists and has caused me to justly enter court to protect my being 1st. Therefore making me not liable for the ABCs, and the Medias' future, legal costs.

News and information that’s in the Australian and World publics’ interest has got nothing to do with whether the criminal Free Trade Press loves or loathes me. They are criminally violating the public worldwide, education, science and progress by their criminal blacklisting me.  I stated years ago that writers were being violated by the Medias' controlling of the public mind by their dumping of news and information that's in the publics' interest. I stated Arthur C. Clarkes' 3001 book was deficient because of important information of mine that was denied him by the Media. It is hard enough to write a book 40-50 years ahead as was the book called 1984 but 1,000 yrs ahead to 3001 and have it frustrated and ruined at the outset by the Medias' blacklisting of me and my data is a crime.    

The Media are all for Freedom of speech, but of course for "themselves and their friends", but are gross violators of the Freedom of speech of mine and others. Competition within the Media is not and won't compel them to publish, print and broadcast the news and information thats' in the Australian and world publics' interest; only by subjecting the Media to the single statement the "Facts in their true perspective" will. 

The following is another serious suppression of other profound proven scientific data of mine by the Media that mathematicians 1200 years ago, in the 9 or 10th century, established their set of dividing and multiplying by zero that was wrong and proven wrong by me in 1993:

After having been denied a grant to financially fund my fusion project in 1992, I, in 1993, proved 1 Divided or Multiplied by zero = 1 (a non action). This non-exclusive copyrighted data isn't a gift nor a throw away item. It is my means to finance the research and development of my fusion spacecraft rocket engine/reactor through the altering and controlling of the speed of light up and down to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms in a fusion project in Australia with international involvement. The fusion project is dependent on my set of Dividing & multiplying by zero being adapted in all computers and software worldwide and the copyright dollars paid. My politicising of the 2 opposing sets of "Dividing and Multiplying by zero" has resulted in it going before the High Court of Australia in 1996,1998, 2001-2 and in 2003 and will go on and on. The conflict will not end until my proven correct set of Dividing & Multiplying by zero is broadcast publicly by the Media and implemented

- 3 -

worldwide.

Proof: To do an inventory of stock allows a person to exercise their prerogative and multiply any object by 1 or 0 things that it sits upon. 1 cup can be multiplied by 1 saucer = 1 cup, or 1 cup x 1 table = 1 cup, or 1 cup x zero saucers = 1 cup (not zero cups); the phenomena itself is the final officialdom and I have proven it says so. What is paramount is that the correct arithmetic answer is arrived at. The 1 x 0 = 0 returns the wrong answer. 

Following is the my 1993 proof: 1 divided by 0 = 1 (a non action): 1 Tv divided by 1 customer = 1 Tv sold (an action); but 1 Tv divided by 0 customers = 1 Tv unsold (a non action).

My proven set of dividing and multiplying zero proves that everything is subject to its' foundations and subject to "nothing itself" which is the true foundations of everything. 

The Mathematics establishment state you cannot divide by zero and have outlawed it. Therefore they don't have a dividing by zero; so there is only my dividing by zero: 1 / 0 = 1 (a non action). I state that applying the multiplication by zero: 1 x 0 = 0 is also dangerous and must be disabled. The Airline Industry, Air Safety, CASA, Dick Smith and the Media were informed, by me, over the past 10 years of the dangers of multiplying by zero. But the Media and experts suppressed it and left the public ignorant and vulnerable. It follows that since dividing by zero is dangerous then so too is its' opposite multiplying by zero....This means the worlds' mathematicians don't have a set of dividing and multiplying by zero; which means there is only my set but the Criminal Free Trade Press won't publish it.

My evidence and proof is what has to be accepted and not what some one says who has a Professorship, Doctorate or an Expert or World Authority label in front of their name.

For those who can only believe experts, labels and qualifications then the following data and shame is for you.... A book was published in 2000 called "ZERO, the biography of a dangerous idea" and written by Charles Seife who has a BA in mathematics from Princeton University U.S. and a Masters in Mathematics from Yale and a Masters in journalism from the University of Columbia. He is currently, as of 2000, an American correspondent for New Scientist and has written for other publications including Scientific American, Science, The Economist, and Wired UK.

In his book Charles Seife, independently of me for he doesn't know me or my works, states that when a number is divided and then multiplied by the same number then you always get back to the number you started with, for example: 6 / 3 = 2 x 3 = 6. He says that dividing and multiplying by 0 should do the same but doesn't. But using my Dividing and Multiplying by zero then 6 / 0 = 6 x 0 = 6, it returns the original number just as Charles Seife states it should.

The following is an extract from Charles Seifes' book: "..............we saw that 2 x 0 is 0. Thus to undo the multiplication, we have to assume that (2 x 0)/0 will get us back to 2. Likewise, (3 x 0)/0 should get us back to 3, and (4 x 0)/0 should equal 4. But 2 x 0 and 3 x 0 and 4 x 0 each equal zero, as we saw ~ so (2 x 0)/0 equals 0/0, as do (3 x 0)/0 and (4 x 0)/0. Alas, this means that 0/0 equals 2, but it also equals 3, and it also equals 4. This doesn't make any sense.

Strange things also happen when we look at 1/0 in a different way. Multiplication by zero should undo division by zero, so 1/0 x 0 should equal 1"( This I proved in 1993 is correct). "Worst of all, if you wantonly divide by zero, you can destroy the entire foundation of logic and mathematics. Dividing by zero once ~ just one time ~ allows you to prove, mathematically, anything at all in the universe. You can prove that 1 + 1= 42, and from there you can prove that J. Edgar Hoover was a space alien,"... "(see appendix A for a proof that

- 4 -

Winston Churchill was a carrot.)"

Charles Seife has confirmed my stated conclusions that Algebra is a defective and flawed Maths is true! So here, I present the most unprejudiced "Peer Review" giving recognition and

declared support of my set of Dividing and Multiplying by zero possible which is his

conclusions that my set is correct without knowing of it through the media suppressing my proof for 10 years so as to deny it to the public and to deny me the credit of being 1st.

If Master Harper had read the following extract from Justice Miles closing statement of 29th Aug. 02 then he should have understood that the Injunction before the fact and After the fact was refused due to me being poor and unable to give an undertaking as to damages. So how could he preside over this insane black comedy in expecting me to have brought a court action and supply evidence to obtain an Injunction after the fact and also he should have understood that the ABC Lawyers in failing to ask Justice Miles then and there for costs when he asked "Is it necessary to order anything further?" then they had no later claims and they in having dragged me into court was to get those costs under the false Affidavit claim to get the Injunction after the fact dismissed.

"Justice Miles:...... The public are no doubt very interested in this interesting question whether the speed of light is constant or not. So much so that the defendant is dedicating part of it's Catalyst program to this very subject and the other question of course is required from the plaintiff that to be granted a temporary injunction and as I hear Mr Rout is not in a position to offer any undertaking. Although again it is difficult to see what damages would be suffered by the ABC if it was to be restrained from publishing this 6 minute segment as I've been told in its' program tonight. For all those reasons the application is refused. Is it necessary to order anything further?"

The refusing of the Injunction before the fact because of me being "Poor and Powerless" doesn’t entitle nor justify Master Harper or any Judiciary to criminally rule that I lost because my application was dismissed therefore insanely award costs against me. Since my application was supplanted by the Court deciding it all on money and their open and shameless prejudice for the "Rich and Powerful" instead of being based upon the evidence then the ABC is committing a further crime against me by seeking costs from me instead of from the State who is responsible or to bears its' own costs.

Master Harper did not at anytime ask me had my financial position changed so making me "Rich and Powerful" so as to enable him to issue me with the now worthless and meaningless Injunction after the fact on the Catalyst program that had had been aired 4 times and done the damage that I sought to stop by seeking the Injunction before the fact.

Master Harper required only to read my 29th Aug 02 Affidavit or listen to the transcript to know and comprehend "the evidence" that proved I was 1st to prove the speed of light is alterable and controllable in 1998 which proved without doubt that I was justified in going into the court to get an injunction upon the ABCs Catalyst program to stop others being criminally credited with being 1st in the minds of the public by the malicious omission of me and my data, therefore I was not liable for the ABCs legal costs. 

Peer Review has been proven by me to be a discredited and corrupt concept which enables Scientists, Corporations, Universities and the State to receive scientific data and to steal and develop it by not responding and so deny the person credit and recognition for their achievements. This is what Peer Review has done to me. Paul Davies Prof. and many, many others as well have gotten my data and remained silent. Peer Review demands they respond constructively but since they don’t then it proves Peer Review is incompetent and corrupt.

For the ABC and the Media outlets to reject my scientific achievements and works without

Peer Review is shown up as criminal hypocrisy by their televising the Catalyst program of

- 5 -

29th Aug 02. They used suspect data from a suspect Quasar source whos' Peer Review was by one of the scientists who appeared and spoke in the program, a Dr Lineweaver, stating the data isn't credible.

Master Harper required only to read my 29th Aug 02 Affidavit and listen to the transcript to know and comprehend that there was no injunction before or after the fact. He required to question what Tress Cocks and Maddox was doing committing perjury in their affidavit to illegally drag me into court to have the "non-existent injunction after the fact" dismissed so as to illegally and unjustly get the costs awarded against me with the intent to prejudice my action for damages. Also to offer to waive the costs to intimidate me into walking away and drop any and all actions by me against the ABC. Tress Cocks and Maddox has made that obscene offer to me in a letter which I rejected outright. But I point out that no mention or offers to have my proof that the speed of light is alterable and controllable broadcast by the ABC with recognition of my being 1st. This exposes their criminal motive for committing perjury and their "obstructing and perverting the course of justice" by having the non-existent injunction after the fact dealt with first ahead of the action for damages so perverting the course of justice. 

Questions need to be asked and answered:

Why didn't Tress Cocks and Maddox state the "truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth" that there was no injunction after the fact but only my action for damages subject to my prerogative. This is because the Injunction before the fact was not issued on the grounds

that I was "Poor and Powerless". The course of justice had been obstructed and perverted by the supplanting of my case and evidence with the criminal scam that I can't get an injunction against the "Rich and Powerful and the Media" unless I'm rich and powerful as well. But since I am "Poor and Powerless" then my application for the Injunction before the fact is dismissed and since it's dismissed, because I'm "Poor and Powerless", then I am ordered to pay the Rich and Powerful and Medias' legal costs, that the State is actually liable, and not me. This confirms the publics' historical conclusion of Lawyers as having character that's lower than shark shit! And from that I conclude and state Lawyers must not be accepted but rejected from becoming Judges.

These Lawyers come Judges are prejudiced in favour of their fellow Lawyer, Legal fraternity and intentionally rule against the self representative to discourage people representing themselves. The Court Judicial system "is" to come down to the ordinary citizens standards and are not to demand, pressure nor expect us self representatives to comply with the legal establishments historical baggage.

The solution to the problems of self representatives is for the Court Judicial Legal system to move to "REASONING" by being subject to the single statement of the "Facts in their true Perspective, relative to the phenomena". Proven by me to be a Law of this Universe in Jan 1997, but again not published, printed nor broadcast by the Media.  

Why did Master Harper fail to perceive the perjury of Tress Cocks and Maddox in their Affidavit? Following is the relevant extract from their Affidavit of 11th April 03: 

Following is an extract from the 29th Aug 02:

- 6 -

"Justice Miles: That's the law, I can tell you that. You can't get an injunction unless you can show that damages would be inadequate." 

That statement made it crystal clear that the Court Judicial legal system was extremely prejudiced in favour of the "Rich and Powerful" and the Media and extremely prejudiced against the "Poor and Powerless" and me. It was made crystal clear it wasn't about the evidence but about money, power and prejudice. The statement by Justice Miles was heard loud and clear by the Lawyer fraternity, by the "Rich and Powerful" and by the "Media". If they heard and remembered nothing else they all heard it and it would have been imprinted on their brains permanently. They all knew the case ended right there and should not have been allowed to proceed and should have been rejected from going into court in the first place when I presented my health care card to have the court fees waived. No questions were asked by the registrar for proof that I was "Rich and Powerful" and told it was imperative that I was, nor was I told that in my being "Poor and Powerless" then I could and would only lose! Nor was I told that in losing because I'm "Poor and Powerless" the extremely prejudiced Court Judicial legal system would criminally rule for me to pay the "Rich and Powerful Medias" legal costs.

"Justice Miles(extract from transcript 29th Aug 2): If I grant you a temporary Injunction then when it's eventually heard, if you lose it, can you give an undertaking that you'll pay damages that the ABC suffer as a result of not being allowed to broadcast this program?"

I stated no; it "would send me bankrupt!"....Again an admission by the Supreme Court Judiciary that it had nothing to do with the evidence nor with reasoning and was all about

being "Rich and Powerful" and money. The Injunction before the fact in having been

proven by me as being justified prevents any and all litigation for damages against me by the ABC in the future. 

Justice Miles statement: "You can't get an injunction unless you can show that damages would be inadequate" is crazy and unjust because what is priceless to me can be worthless to others. The credit and recognition of my being 1st to evidence 1990-92 and prove 1998 that the speed of light is alterable and controllable by it being relative to the 4th dimension; the density of space itself and the proof of Sept 02 that TIME is relative to the speed of light is priceless; you can't buy it and it isn't for sale. Einstein made Time relative to Mass so that as a spacecraft or object increases its' speed its' mass increases so causing the speed of light to fall causing TIME to slow down. Einstein circumvented his problem of "everything is relative" that compelled him if he made the speed of light alterable then he had to make it relative to something. But he had nothing in the 3 dimensional universe to make it relative to. He couldn't make it relative to Mass for that would be crazy but he resolved the problem by making TIME the variable and relative to Mass and the speed of light a constant. Einstein knew you can't alter the constants of physics and the speed of light without making them relative to something. This is the intellectual scientific discipline adhered to by Einstein that

made him the great scientist he became.

Paul Davies Prof., Dr John Webb, Dr Lineweaver, Dr Michael Murphy, Tamara Davis Phd student and others have altered the speed of light and the constants of physics oblivious to them having to be relative to something. This exposes them all and the Catalyst program and the Media as of low intelligence and poor to bad scientists.

What price is it worth to be 1st to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms? That opportunity of my being 1st is denied me by the obstructionism I face. This court is responsible for this legal mess that is obstructing and frustrating the resolution of this matter of plagiarism.

- 7 -

For the Judiciary and Lawyers and Government servants to aspire to and achieve the brilliant reasoning abilities acquired by Einstein and myself then they must subject themselves to the mental discipline of being mentally subject to and apply the single statement the "Facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena".

It’s obscene, it's criminal, it's degenerative, it is insane to think and act as though everything can be reduced to money. And this is what the Supreme Court Judiciary have done and worse. To remove and deny the right of the poor and powerless and me from preventing damage being done before the fact and to bare us to the unlimited and endless violations of the "Rich and Powerful", so we can only seek damages after the fact before a profoundly and extremely prejudiced Court Judiciary who have openly, unashamedly confessed publicly in court their prejudice in favour of the Rich and Powerful and Privileged, is a crime against humanity. 

If I had have sought the Injunction after the fact then Master Harper should have said Mr Rout you know full well that you being Poor and Powerless then you can't get an Injunction after the fact just as you couldn't get an Injunction before the fact from Justice Miles which exposes the 11th April 03 court hearing brought on unlawfully by the ABC Lawyers as insane, resulting in the insane ruling awarding costs against me. It being insane then it has no credibility nor legality....Only a deranged fool would enter court seeking an Injunction after the fact knowing that Justice Miles had made it crystal clear injunctions whether before or after the fact are not issued to the "Poor and Powerless" and poor me. The ABC Lawyers knew this and it proves Tress Cocks and Maddox & their partners Sparke Helmore are guilty of Perjury and guilty of Obstructing and perverting the course of justice! 

Why did Master Harper fail to wake up and perceive the ABC Lawyers were acting as though an interim injunction had been issued and they had been waiting ever so patiently for me to bring the matter before the court so they could clear the held up Catalyst program for televising? But Master Harper admitted the Catalyst program had been aired so why didn't he wake up that an interim injunction hadn't been issued by Justice Miles and if it had then a date for a hearing would have been set, but wasn't because there was no interim injunction issued. This meant I didn't require legally or otherwise to bring on a hearing to obtain an Injunction after the fact that I never sought. It was my prerogative to bring on my Action for Damages. Why didn't didn't Master Harper wake up?

Why did Master Harper fail to wake up to the fact there was no injunction after the fact therefore no legal requirement nor necessity for me to seek it, therefore no legal necessity for the ABC Lawyers to have it dismissed. Why is it Master Harper didn't wake up to the fact I had never asked for, sought nor even indicated I ever wanted an Injunction after the fact. I

had only required and sought the Injunction before the fact to prevent damage being done to me. Why is it Master Harper didn't wake up with my attempting to bring on my Action for Damages and wake up to something being seriously wrong? 

Why did Master Harper fail to wake up to the fact that to bring on the non-existent Injunction after the fact before the hearing of my Action for Damages against the ABC was to fulfill the criminal intent of the ABC Lawyers to Obstruct and Pervert the course of Justice. Why did Master Harper fail to wake up to his actively colluding with the ABC Lawyers in their "Obstructing and Perverting of the course of Justice" against me. Why did Master Harper fail to wake up to injunctions after the fact or bans or restrictions on the offending Catalyst program have to come at the end of the course of justice after the Action for Damages and not before. Why did Master Harper fail to wake up to it being my prerogative to leave the spent Catalyst program available for purchase by people to see and understand plagiarism by omission.

- 8 -      

I would have had to be a raving stupid fool to have sought an Injunction after the fact on a Catalyst program that had been aired 4 times, twice more than normal, and had been archived. Why did Master Harper fail or was it he intentionally refused to wake up, because he too was grossly Prejudiced in favour of the Rich and Powerful Media and about accommodating their any and all whims and wants so opposing the fact that there was nothing but an Action for Damages left for me. He had to have known to award costs against me was to prejudice and jeopardise the success of my "Action for Damages".

Master Harper was fully awake to his extreme prejudice in favour of the Rich and Powerful and the Media by stating I had lost the case knowing that any and all Injunctions were not issued to the "Poor and Powerless and Me" and to conclude that proves I lost, due to my application for an "Injunction before the fact" being dismissed but was actually supplanted with the Courts' "Crime against Humanity" resulting from the insane black comedy of prejudice therefore I pay the Rich and Powerful ABCs legal costs is a grave crime against humanity. This gross criminal act proves Master Harper is a corrupt judge and that all citizens should refuse to have him preside, and appeal all rulings by him using this case as proof of gross prejudice and irrationality.          

I'll quote a paralleled universal truth from Forrest Gump: Insane is, as insane does!

The ruling by Justice Harper was insane, and in being insane it isn't credible nor legitimate.

The 2 hearings before Justice Miles 28th Aug 02. and Justice Harper 11 Apr. 03 clearly reveals and proves gross, unashamed and publicly confessed prejudice for the "Rich and

Powerful and the Media" and extreme prejudice against the "Poor and Powerless"

resulting in the absolute necessity for my Action for Damages having to go before a jury and any appeals having to be heard by a jury and not by Judges. 

As well the court hearings revealed a hostile attitude towards me and persons representing themselves.

A degree of justice was denied me by no security of $monies being demanded up front by the court from the ABC when the Injunction was denied due to me being "Poor and Powerless", so as to meet the legal costs of my Action for Damages. 

Justice Miles and Justice Harper are both guilty of "obstructing and perverting the course of justice".

Justice Miles had not read the Affidavit before the hearing began on the 28th Aug 03. That is proven by his startled reaction and flustered questions and exceeding lack of understanding of my referring to my having "proven the speed of light is alterable and controllable"   

Theodore J Rout Vs ABC – 29th August 2002

Judge: Are you Mr. Rout?

Rout: Yes I am.

Judge: Right, now what’s your application?

Rout: The ABC; and I have evidence of this, are starting to plagiarise my work and publish

it. They have had years in which to do so in my name. For example the slowing down

of the speed of light.

Judge: Sorry?

Rout: Slowing down and speeding up the speed of light. It’s under several different

Copyrights.

Judge: What is?

- 9 -

Rout: The altering of the speed of light up or down. I’ve already proven that the speed of light

is alterable.Judge: What a minute, are you saying that you published work about the

speed of light?

Rout: Up and down.

Judge: Hold on. Let’s start. It’s about the speed of light. You’ve published work about the

speed of light and you’ve expressed the view in publications that the speed of light

slows down?

This is why Judges wrongly refer to what a person asks for on the front of the Affidavit rather than what is stated and explained in the Affivavit. Justice Miles and all other Judges are not reading and understanding the Affidavits before entering the court and offensively AD LIB.  

The State has an undeniable obligation to ensure that the persons, in this matter me, responsible for intellectual achievements are recognised as being 1st, not 2nd, not last but 1st now and always. This ensures historical truth for posterity and corrupt failure to do so is a crime against the person and posterity. The Australian State and Courts are not honourable by allowing others to plagiarise by usurping the merit, ingenuity, creativity, sweat, intelligence, brilliance, originality, recognition of being 1st and remuneration of another persons work by direct, indirect or by any other plausible, surreptitious means, by omissions and/or by the deliberate and malicious refusing to acknowledge me as being 1st to perceive in 1990-2 and prove in 1998 "the speed of light is alterable and controllable". The previous statements explains Plagiarism. The Catalyst program is guilty of this sinister and contemptuous act of usurpation so as to credit others with being 1st publicly and have me remain an invisible last by omission.

Justice Miles in not reading the Affidavit, then he didn't read the 2 newspaper reports attached which revealed that the Catalyst program likewise was all about crediting others as being the 1st to perceive and evidenced the speed of light is alterable, just as the newspaper articles had. The newspaper articles had already presented others with being 1st and me as an invisible last, so that blatantly and obviously proved what the Catalyst program that night was

going to do; it was going to violate and damage me and portray others as being 1st.

This proved my justification in seeking the "Injunction before the fact" upon the Catalyst program and their paying not only their own costs but also my costs. The failure of the ABC and Catalyst program before, at or after the screening of their plagiarist program to even seek to film and broadcast my superior scientific achievements proves their malicious intent to credit others as being 1st and to permanently deny me recognition as they have for more than 11years. It follows that upon not giving recognition to me then they must criminally credit others with being 1st and maintain me as an invisible last. 

The concept of plagiarism to be understood must encompass the whole dimension and spectrum of plagiarism and its' crimes of usurpation of the attributes of whatever works are involved by the direct, indirect, surreptitious or by any other means. Plagiarism cannot be nor be allowed or accepted being reduced to pilfering a few words, paragraphs or whole sections of words. Stealing of words is unsatisfactory in defining plagiarism. Therefore plagiarism is the usurping of the merit, creativity, ingenuity, brilliance, sweat and tears, labour, thinking and reasoning, achievements, intellect, perceptions, understanding, communications, originality and remunerations of others persons works. In my case the ABC is guilty of plagiarism by omission and making some innocent persons unwitting plagiarists by their being presented as 1st. 

The Catalyst program should not have gone to air. In having done so it has done serious damage to me, my credibility, my reputation, denial of public recognition of my profound scientific achievements and future sales of my book on the "Perpetual Universe" that has superceded the Big Bang theory.

- 10 -

The fact is the Supreme Courts' Justice Miles and Master Harper implemented this Crime against humanity and the ABC Lawyers, Tress Cocks & Maddox and Sparke Helmore, didn't react to this obscene crime neither did the Canberra Times journalist Roderick Campbell and the Media. The Media didn't react and make this Crime against humanity front page news that they are beneficiaries of. It wasn't a single event, no one gasped in shock so it is normal, an everyday happening across Australia which proves that the Court Judicial legal system reeks and is rotten with this massive criminal prejudice in favour of the "Rich and Powerful and the Media", and extreme prejudice against the "Poor and Powerless" and is also hostile to self representatives. Indonesian and Thailands' Judicial legal systems were reported as being highly corrupt by the Australian Media. They now have the proof via this Crime against humanity resulting from this Insane Black Comedy to expose publicly that the Australian Court Judicial Legal system reeks of and is corrupt with massive unashamed prejudice for the Rich and Powerful and extreme prejudice against the Poor and Powerless and me.

Insane people abandon the evidence and abandon reasoning. To abandon reasoning is to be insane. To abandon the evidence and reasoning is to be criminally insane. The Supreme Courts Judiciary and Master Harper have abandoned the evidence and reasoning by supplanting my application for an Injunction before the fact with the Courts criminal scam and abandoned my application of evidence. Master Harper demonstrated he’d abandoned the application of evidence and abandoned reasoning by ruling that my application of evidence seeking an Injunction before the fact was dismissed and since it was dismissed (abandoned, criminally interpreted as dismissed), then I pay the "Rich and Powerful" ABCs legal costs.

The Aust. Court Judicial Legal system has a serious problem of abandonment of reasoning.

"Justice Miles: That's the law, I can tell you that. You can't get an injunction unless you can show that damages would be inadequate."…. That statement Obstructs and perverts the course of justice" and is grossly corrupt and massively prejudiced towards the rich!

The concept of "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth" is not being implemented and practiced for to do so means everything, everything is placed face up on the table for all to see as in show poker to eliminate the corrupt and incompetent adversarial court Judicial system. The reasoning, conclusions and decisions must be subject to the "facts

in their true perspective" otherwise the Court and Government Depts are not entitled legally,

morally or ethically to ask for or demand the truth of anyone and consequently perjury doesn't exist.   

An English Judge said many decades ago that "Justice must not only be done, but Justice must also be seen to be done". That statement has been reduced to being nothing more than idle senile chatter by the Australian Court Judicial legal system.  

- 11-

SWORN (or AFFIRMED) by the deponent

at Canberra in the Australian Capital Territory

Before me

Justice of the Peace / Solicitor