1st LETTER of 20^TH June 2003 to: Attention Registrar of the Supreme Court and the Judiciary.

1st LETTER of 20^TH June 2003 TO: Attention ACT, Attorney General, Mr Stanhope,

___________________________________________________________                                                                                                            

1st  LETTER of 20TH JUNE 03 to:

Attention Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court,

The following is in regard to a "Notice of Motion" by the ABCs Law Firm for a hearing on the 2^nd July 03 re the 22^nd July 03 Appeal…. Rout V. ABC……I cannot and must not attend.

My appeal against the ruling of Master Harper has been set down for the 22 July 2003 and agreed to by the ABCs Law Firm on Tuesday the 10^th June 2003 before the Deputy registrar. Since they agreed to the date then they cannot then issue notices of motions contrary to that date. But in having done so proves their gross incompetence with criminal intent by Tress Cocks and Maddox and their partners Sparke Helmore to unlawfully attempt to again "Obstruct and Pervert the course of Justice". This new attempt simply confirms the proven 11^th April hearing was a deliberate act of "Obstructing and Perverting of the course of Justice".

These criminal activities are not one off because the Court Judicial legal system react as though it is all normal for Tress Cocks and Maddox & Sparke Helmore to have no fear or concern for their "Obstructing and Perverting of the course of Justice". This they must not be allowed to get away with.

It also proves the Court Judicial legal system is failing to stop Law Firms from indulging in these acts of "Obstructing and perverting of the course of justice" but actually collude in these corrupt and unlawful acts, as did Master Harper collude on the 11^th April 2003.

The obvious criminal and incompetent intent of the ABCs law Firm is to abuse and waste my meager means so as to frustrate, wreck and destroy my Appeal on the 22^nd July 2003 and my pending "Actions for Damages". I can not and must not appear on the 2^nd July 2003. To appear will result in my having to rewrite my Affidavit of the 22^nd July Appeal and to have the hearing postponed for 6 to 8 weeks. Again and again the ABCs Law Firm could issue "Notices of Motions" to frustrate, obstruct and pervert the course of Justice with impunity, and with the collusion of the proven massively prejudiced Judiciary of the Supreme Court in favour of the "Rich and Powerful" and their proven extreme prejudice against the "Poor and Powerless and me". This is why my intended "Action for damages" must go before a jury and any appeals must also be heard by juries and not by Judiciary.

I have to prepare books for the 22^nd July hearing and prepare my "Action for Damages" against the ABC and now against Tress Cocks and Maddox and their Partners Sparke Helmore. I require to communicate with the Attorney General Mr Stanhope and secure it to be heard only before a jury. I obviously must not allow my 22^nd July 2003 Appeal and my meager means to be abused and squandered by the ABCs Law Firms. The ABCs law Firm is also about inflating the costs to use against me as well.

This letter has taken up 2 days of my valuable time and I also have to write up a further letter to the NSW and ACT Law Societies to add to the complaint that I have already made to them regarding the ABCs Law Firms.

The 22^nd July 2003 Appeal is about the whole Truth but the 2^nd July hearing isn’t.

Page: 1

Any ruling on the 2^nd July would be irrelevant because the prejudice of the Judiciary has been proven without doubt making the 22^nd July hearing stand. This proves that since the ABC law Firm knows this then they are knowingly committing an act of obstructing and perverting the course of justice by issuing a "Notice of Motion" for a 2^nd July hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2nd LETTER of 21st  JULY 2003 to:

Attention Registrar of the Supreme Court and the Judiciary.

A time comes in all our lives when it is required to question ones’ sanity and that time has come for the Supreme Court and its’ Judiciary to question their sanity!

This is a letter stating why I cannot and must not appear in relation to the unjustified "Notice of Motion" unjustifiably issued by the Supreme Court and the ABC Lawyers for a 24^th July 03 hearing. I have already proven numerous matters justifying my appeal and is contained in my Affidavit, but I will in this letter prove it even more. For example it is in the publics’ interest and a blow for Justice that I and the public do not appear in Courts when an unjustified "Notice of Motion" is served upon us, so rendering the unjustified hearing and any and all its’ rulings null and void.

The Australian Court judicial legal system was guilty in 1959 of intending to execute an Australian aboriginal, who was illiterate for he, Max Stuart, couldn’t read or write, with a confession that was known to have been dictated and written by the South Australian police. It was only citizens, a priest, Father Dixon and the Rupert Murdoch press that saved him 8 times from hanging and not Judges not Lawyers, not Barristers nor the loathsome Australian legal system other than the 2 solicitors who represented him, David O’Sullivan and Helen Devaney. The Aboriginals’ Solicitor, David O’Sullivan, stated that "the Australian Judicial system is not only antiquated but it acts against the poor and those who can’t defend themselves"(quote from the true story recently released film "Black and White"). This was true then in 1959 and is as true today, in the year 2003, and my case against the ABC and against the Judiciary and against the Lawyer fraternity again proves it to be true.

On citizens and I proving justification in bringing persons before the court, as I did with the ABC, then citizens and I justifiably do not pay their legal costs! The awarding of costs against me on the basis that I lost is to commit an act of "Obstructing and perverting the course of Justice" and is proven by it delaying and undermining the credibility of my "Action for Damages". The ABC paying their own costs due to having been brought into court justifiably eliminates that crime.

Justice Miles ruling of the 29^th Aug 2002 that "Injunctions before or after the fact are not issued to the Poor, Powerless and me against the Rich and Powerful". The ruling has criminally abandoned the evidence and supplanted the "Whole Truth" with this criminal scam based upon money, power and powerlessness. The Supreme Court judiciary has declared money is power and to be poor is to be powerless without any rights. They are guilty of a crime against humanity.

ABC Lawyers guilty of perjury and guilty of obstructing and perverting the course of justice. Their perjury must not be rewarded.

The abuse of this reality by the Supreme Court Judiciary and legal system criminally allows the unlawful dragging of persons before courts and their abuse with the collusion of the Judiciary. This can be plainly seen by the ABCs Lawyer Stephen Collins, Tress Cocks & Maddox and Sparke Helmore, who are serial pests with their incessant and habitual issuing of "Notices of Motions" unlawfully and criminally drag me before the court so as to abuse me and waste my meager resources and money in conjunction with their Judicial friends. This highly criminal activity is a weapon used by the "Rich and Powerful" to intimidate and subjugate the "Poor and Powerless" and others to back off otherwise face bankruptcy and implemented by the Lawyers on the bench now acting as Judges. This criminal and anti justice of loser pays is what has caused the ABC, its’ Lawyers and the judiciary of the Supreme court to be guilty of "Obstructing and perverting the course of justice" and being in the position of requiring to face trial before a jury through my "Action for Damages".

The Supreme Court Judiciary had the opportunity to dismiss the 2^nd July "Notice of Motion" of the ABC Lawyers to obstruct and pervert the course of justice, again. Again evidence of the Judiciary failing to read and/or understand the evidence in my Affidavit that clearly proves in numerous ways that my appeal against both the 29^th Aug 2002 and the 11^th April 2003 is justified. Since I have supplied more than adequate proof that my appeal is justified then I cannot and must not appear before the Supreme Court on the 24th July 2003, so as not to give credibility nor legality to being dragged and dragged and dragged incessantly and unjustly into court. The Supreme Court unlawfully has sent me a "Notice of Motion" to appear on the 24^th of July without proving justification and since they have not proven justification then I do not require to attend and must not attend.

I spoke to the Senate Committee, at Federal Parliament, who stated that they can not request nor demand citizens to front up before a Senate inquiry without having first proven justification. The Senate Committee stated that if they dragged or demanded citizens to front up before a Senate Inquiry without proof of justification then their credibility and reputation would be destroyed and would end up in the gutter. I further state that Parliament cannot drag people before parliament without first proving justification. Also the police and ASIO cannot demand people front up before them without first proving justification; failure to do so is a criminal act, whether they agree or not, it’s a criminal act. So it becomes plainly obvious that the Court and Judiciary also cannot drag people before the courts without first proving justification and since they are then the Court judicial systems credibility and reputation is headed for the gutter and justifiably so. The proof of my appeal being justified on many and varied reasons is contained in my Affidavit.

This is to protect my right to present my evidence once to the Court and not having to present it twice, three and four and five times to accommodate the "Obstructing and perverting of the course of justice" by the ABCs’ lawyers with the collusion of their Judicial friends.

immediately after stating my only recourse was to seek damages. To have done so would have severed the continuity between the "Injunction before the fact" and the "Action for Damages." and also be discrediting it.

On the 11^th April 03 I stated to Master Harper that I didn’t want the case ended for it would cause a break in continuity to the detriment of my "Action for Damages." The statement by Master Harper, before awarding costs against me on the 11^th April 03, was that I had lost. His stating I had lost is to state absolutely that the ABCs Lawyers have "Obstructed and perverted the course of justice" with Master Harpers’ collusion. To declare I had lost was stupid for my "Action for Damages" had not been heard and settled and is to wrongly say I had dragged the ABC Catalyst program unjustifiably before the court on the 29^th Aug 02.

Now it is blatantly obvious that my "Action for Damages" is being held up, which proves it is being obstructed by the perjury and its’ associated "Obstructing and Perverting of the course of justice" at the 11^th April 03 court hearing by the ABC Lawyers that should not have been allowed before the court because their "Notice of Motion" had not supplied the evidence proving justification for the court hearing nor to have me appear before the court. In fact it was criminal because there was no "Injunction after the fact" to have dismissed because there was no "Injunction before the fact." My whole intention has been about prevention which is a concept solely about before the fact and not about after the fact.

They all knew I was "Poor and Powerless" and the judiciary knew I had used my health care card to waiver the Court Fees. So they all knew there was no way an Injunction would be granted to me on the 29^th Aug 02 since it was to be decided upon money, power and powerlessness. So the Supreme court was negligent in allowing the 29^th Aug 02 to proceed into court for they all knew the Injunction hearing was to be based upon "Money and Power" and the discarding of the "truth, the whole truth" which was a criminal act, but in fact makes it a 1^st degree crime and the court liable for the costs and not me.

A very serious matter has been realised: The order stated by Justice Miles on the "Record of proceedings" dated the 29^th Aug 2002 is FALSE! The prejudice, bias and corruption of the Supreme Court is so bad that the reason for the refusal of the "Injunction before the fact" regarding the ABC Catalyst program has been falsely stated: Justice Miles order: "As there is no likely breach of Copyright, the application has been refused." Whereas the "Injunction before the fact" was refused because Injunctions are not given against the "Rich and powerful" because they have long pockets and unless I can prove damages are inadequate, which is a criminally prejudiced loaded dice, then an injunction will not be issued unless I can give an undertaking to meet any damages brought against me by the "Rich and Powerful", for any losses they may incur. Simply stated: I the poor and powerless cannot get injunctions, before or after the fact, against the Rich and Powerful.

The ABCs Lawyers Stephen Collins, Tim Unsworth, Mr Woulfe, their Law firms and the ABC Chairperson Donald McDonald and the ABC Board knew the order by Justice Miles of 29^th Aug 02 was false. But they have continued to treat it and use it as though it was the "The Whole Truth". This renders both hearings and rulings of 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th April 03 corrupt with no credibility or legality. They all are knowingly involved in a conspiracy to maintain that false "Record of Proceedings" as credible and use that perjured statement to unlawfully win over me. They all in negating their obligations and responsibilities to speak out and expose it as false so correct their falsehood of the "Truth, the Whole Truth" then it follows they have "lost" the entire case against me. This now puts in question any necessity for my Appeal against the 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th April 03 corrupt and discredited hearings and rulings. It now clears the way for the course of justice to get back on track and proceed unhindered before a jury with my "Action for Damages".

- 3 -

Why does the ABC media, with the full knowledge of the ABC Board dump this News and information of serious corruption of the Supreme Court, that the public has the right to know, into the garbage and not broadcast it to the Australian public who should be informed?

My intellectual property, some under copyright, was required, by Justice Miles, to be downgraded and reduced to trivia and made commonplace and actually worthless so as to use it as a substitute to cover up the real reason for the refusal of the "Injunction against the Rich and Powerful". This of course aids and abets the "Rich and Powerful" and others to steal my intellectual copyrights and achievements and to not pay copyright.

It also gives off an odour that smells of a personal attack upon me when Justice Miles suggested that the ABC Catalyst program might give me a plug. Included with this letter is a copy of the registered Business name and the letter from the Dept. of Industry, Science and Technology of 1992 refusing my National Research and Development grant. It was for the applying of the altering and controlling of the speed of light by the altering of the "4^th Dimension", being the density of space itself to which the speed of light is relative, to create a controlled fusion propulsion reaction in a fusion spacecraft rocket engine/reactor by modifications designed to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms. This would bring Australia to the forefront in space technology and energy production. It shows I alone am 1^st to perceive and evidence in 1992 and proved in 1998 the "speed of light is alterable and controllable" which I supplied to the Supreme Court in writing and verbally on the 29^th Aug 03 hearing and worth much, much more than a plug by the ABC.

My having perceived prior to 1992 and proven in 1998 that the "speed of light is alterable and controllable" is a massive and profound lone scientific achievement which is important to humanity and to science. It can be worth vast sums of money and obviously of extreme importance to the poor and powerless of this world because I had given 90% ownership of it and the copyrights to be owned and controlled by the public independent of the State whom it is known can’t be trusted with public assets. But now it is proven my intellectual property and achievements and public assets can’t be trusted in the hands of the Judiciary and the Legal system. My intellectual property was and is released publicly under my concept, my Non-exclusive copyright which makes it available to all worldwide but they who make money from it and apply it are to pay copyright dollars. To credit oneself or others with my scientific achievements, as the ABC has done, is to violate my "Non-exclusive copyright" and intellectual achievements.

Since I had revealed my intellectual data to the Dept. of Industry, Science and Technology in 1992 and unknown outside scientific persons on its’ board then I was compelled to release it publicly under my non-exclusive copyright. Standard copyrights were useless and patents expire in 15 years which are also useless for fusion technology can take 20 to 50 years to develop. So only my non-exclusive copyright agreement with the world can work.

Justice Miles in falsely stating the reason for the refusal of the "Injunction before the fact" has committed perjury. He has persons reasoning from false premises. Consequently the result of this false "Record of Proceedings" has rendered the court proceedings of the 11^th April 2003 as invalid and corrupt for Master Harper was reasoning from a false "Record of Proceedings" of the 29^th Aug 2002.

The Legal Aid Office has agreed that the "Record of Proceedings" would have been used by Master Harper on the 11^th April 2003 to enable him "not" to read, study and understand my Affidavit nor transcripts which in turn confirms my perceiving him as adlibbing at the 11^th April hearing. It proves Master Harper didn’t understand at all what my case of 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th April 03 was all about. His decision on the 11^th April 03 was based upon the false

statement by Justice Miles rendering it invalid.

The Supreme Court demands from me and the public "The truth, THE WHOLE TRUTH". The false "Record of Proceedings" proves there is one law for us and another for those of the legal fraternity. Justice Miles obviously knew of the enormity of the corruption of his ruling of the 29^th Aug 02 and the massive prejudice in favour of the "Rich and Powerful" with the extreme prejudice against the "Poor, Powerless and me". He chose to cover it all up with his false "Record of Proceedings."

At my appeal hearing the Supreme Court judiciary will have the opportunity to acknowledge and accept what has been proven. The perceiving of the "facts in their true perspective" relative to the phenomena is a discipline that has to be practiced at all times and that it is mandatory for all Judiciary and all Lawyers to do all of the time.

Judiciary are to acknowledge and accept that the Laws of this Universes and its’ laws of mathematics, physics and chemistry are the law 1^st and foremost. Everything is subject to its’ foundations and the laws of this universe are the foundations. Legislation doesn’t begin nor end with legislation nor with the constitution. For legislation not to be subject to the Universes’ laws of physics etc. etc then the State has placed itself above the law. It is in the publics’ interest that the Universes laws of physics etc. etc. are the law so as to empower the public to have the proven unsafe railway infrastructures, for example in NSW, shut down and/or repaired regardless of legislation, political parties, Courts and governments. Also empowering the public and lone citizens to overrule and force CASA, the Air Safety Authority, in relation with maintaining the safety of air crafts etc..

It’s as plain as the nose on ones’ face that the Hearing of the 2^nd of July 03 would have been

As well the ABCs Lawyer Stephen Collins has sent me a letter in which he makes false statements, again he makes purjerous statements in relation to my originating Application and "Notice of Motion" of the 28^th and 29^th Aug 2002. He says "The originating application sought final injunctive relief……, Justice Miles did not and could not dismiss the claim made in the originating Application. That claim could not be determined except by

They are the mad perjurous words of the ABCs lawyer Stephen Collins and not mine.

He falsely states "Justice Miles did not and could not dismiss etc…." Well Justice Miles

- 5 -

did dismiss when he ruled that "I the poor and powerless" can’t get any "Injunctions before the fact" and that proves "After the fact as well" against the "Rich and Powerful" and that is what has been implemented because I haven’t gotten the "Injunction before the fact". Their knowing this proves they knew I could not and would not enter court to obtain an "Injunction after the fact" nor have some non-existent application dismissed for they knew if there was one then it also had been dismissed by Justice Miles. So they committed perjury in their Affidavit by stating they wanted that non-existent application dismissed, when in fact they used their perjury to have their costs awarded against me, that was their sole motive and intent. Only the "Action for Damages" was to follow subject to my prerogative. Any other court actions and rulings such as the 11^th April 2003, 2^nd July and/or 24^th July 2003 or any others have no credibility nor legality, other than my "Appeal" and "Action for Damages".

The 29^th Aug 2003 has also been proven as corrupt and without credibility or legality due to Justice Miles FALSE "Record of Proceedings."

My Originating Application stated only: "Nature of action: Injunction to stop the airing of plagiarized intellectual data, some being under copyright" This clearly reveals I used the words "TO STOP" which I repeated in my "Notice of Motion" which are words to prevent damage and trouble before the fact and doesn’t refer at all in anyway to "after the fact" nor to me seeking or wanting any form of worthless and meaningless "Injunction after the fact", after the Catalyst program was aired and the damage having been done to me. Upon the Catalyst program being aired any and all matters of injunctions STOPPED, ended right there with my words "to stop". My right to bring on an "Action for Damages" after the fact is being pervertedly portrayed by the ABCs Lawyer Stephen Collins as an "Injunction after the fact." Any matters pertaining to the spent and now worthless Catalyst program comes at the tail end of the "Action for Damages" and subject to my prerogative so maintaining the course of justice that the ABCs lawyers and Judiciary are and have Obstructed and perverted.

No wonder I am told to get Legal advice. It becomes clear legal advice would be for me to accept the corruption and insanity of the legal system and allow and accept perjury and the "Obstructing of the Course of Justice" by lawyers with the collusion of the judiciary and the gross criminality of loser pays the costs and denial of justice to the Poor and Powerless.

I have had legal advice from several lawyers that was only fit for pig swill. Also I will be lodging a complaint against the Free Legal Advice service for they attempted to Mary Poppinise my case by avoiding the perjury, the Obstructing and Perverting of the course of justice, collusion and corruption. I stated to them that they are only good at advising the poor and powerless to bend over, drop their pants and to be shafted.

- 6 -

This should be of grave concern to the Australian people for Australia is becoming an "Opulent Rich country full of Poor people".

If I had have sought to issue a "Notice of Motion" for an "Injunction after the fact" then on merit it would have had to be rejected because it had already been ruled that "Injunctions" are not issued against the "Rich and Powerful" with long pockets and since I am "Poor and Powerless" with short pockets then there is no way, under those conditions, can I get an "Injunction", whether before or after the fact ,against the "Rich and Powerful". Therefore if I had have gone to the court to get an "Injunction after the fact" on the spent and archived Catalyst program then I would have been a "deranged fool". But since the ABCs Lawyers initiated and was issued with an unjustified "Notice of Motion" to force me to commit an insane act by forcing me into court and to have me seek this unwanted, unsought and unattainable "Injunction after the fact" on a spent, worthless and archived Catalyst program makes them, the ABC and its’ Lawyers Stephen Collins, Tim Unsworth, Mr Woulfe and their Law firms, including Master Harper, "Deranged Fools", and the Court hearing and the ruling that I the "Poor and Powerless" pay the "Rich and Powerfuls" legal costs as insane and being insane proves the awarding of costs against me has no credibility nor legality!

In the up coming Appeal hearing the Supreme Court Judiciary and the ABC, its’ Lawyers and Law firms are to acknowledge and accept what I have proven, including what I have proven in the previous paragraph, that they all were insane so confirming Forrest Gumps’ paralleled universal truth: "Criminal insanity is, as Criminal insanity does!"

----------------------------------------------------

1st  LETTER OF 20TH JUNE 2003 TO:

Attention ACT, Attorney General, Mr Stanhope,

I must bring "Actions for Damages" that must go before juries due to my having proven massive prejudice in favour of the "Rich and Powerful" and extreme prejudice against the "Poor and Powerless and me" in 2 cases. The first on the 29^th Aug 02 and then on the 11^th April 2003.

I am compelled to bring an "Action for Damages" against the ABC and also their Law Firm acting for them in a matter of plagiarism of my profound intellectual achievements achieved over of the last 20 to 40 years. Some of my work was beyond the mind of Einstein. I proved Einsteins’ Special Relativity is law in 1993 and proven how and why his General Theory of Relativity is deficient so furthering his work into his Unified Field theory.

I cannot wait around for the science establishment to agree for if I had have then I’d still be waiting today and achieved nothing. The Media are guilty of having blacklisted me for the last 15 years and they have no intention of giving me the credit and recognition for my work and achievements. To blacklist a citizen is a criminal act.

In having blacklisted me then the media to publish, print and broadcast information etc that credits others with being "1^st" in the publics’ mind in relation to my achievements is to commit the crime of usurpation which is the crime of plagiarism. They are plagiarising being 1^st and plagiarists are being created through the criminal courtesy of the Media. I am 1^st to prove the "speed of light is alterable and controllable" in 1998 and I am 1^ST in many other achievements as well. The ABC and the Media are guilty of these crimes and they intend to go on when and wherever they can to credit any and all of my 20 to 40 years of work to others by deceiving the public by maintaining their ignorance of me and my achievements.

I must bring an "Action for Damages" against the ABC and also against their legal representatives’ law firms "Tress Cocks and Maddox" & "Sparke Helmore".

The ACT Supreme court has stated to me that Actions for Damages goes before Judiciary but since I have proven massive prejudice by the judiciary in this matter, between myself and the ABC, then my "Actions for Damages" must be heard by a jury with any appeals to be heard by a jury.

The proof of what I state is contained in the my Affidavit and complaints to the ACT and NSW Law Societies.

Mr Malouf has the Affidavit and the first Law society complaint.

Theodore J. Rout

---------------------------------------------------------------

2nd LETTER OF 21ST JULY 2003 TO:

Attention ACT, Attorney General, Mr Stanhope,

This is an update on the letter of the 20^th June 2003 I sent to you to have my "Action for Damages" heard by a jury due to proof, showing I cannot obtain justice before the Supreme Court judiciary.

The ABC lawyers are again attempting to waste and abuse my meagre means, time and money by dragging me again unjustifiably before the court on the 24^th July 03 to strike down my Appeal against the 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th April 03 rulings. I have written a letter to the Registrar stating why I cannot and must not appear. A copy of that letter and documents are attached.

It contains proof the 29^th Aug 02 "Record of Proceedings" stated by Justice Miles is false.

I consider on this evidence both hearings and rulings of the 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th April 03 are null and void, they require to be discarded so negating any need for my Appeal before the Supreme court which is shown to be unfit to hear my Appeal. The ABCs Lawyers had a duty to speak up regarding the False Order of Justice Miles but remained silent so using it to win over me. Therefore guilty of perjury.