The logic that the bigger the lie the more the world public will believe it was practiced by Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich, also practised by the U.S. political establishment and their Chief Justice Warren of the Supreme court of America presiding over the Warren Commission investigating the 1963 assassination of President John. F. Kennedy. The "BIG LIE"  is also being practised by the Australian Political establishment by it IGNORING, so accepting, Chief Justice Brennan of the High Court of Australias' ruling in 1996 when he presided over my application, the most profound application to the High court of Australia, to have the member for Wills bi-election Micheal Hatton removed on the grounds he stood and intended to sit unlawfully in Federal parliament. Chief Justice Brennan ruled the "High Court doesn't have jurisdiction over the laws of mathematics or physics" which was the "BIG LIE". Brennan then immediately applied jurisdiction by giving me 5 minutes to respond to his dismissal of my application. To use the arithmetic number 5 is to apply mathematics and to use TIME is to apply physics. 

The verdict by the Warren commission was that 3 shots were fired from Lee H. Oswalds' rifle, in 5.6 seconds and he acted alone, killing Kennedy. This was the logic of the "BIG LIE".  The entire U.S. military establishment and their then Supreme commander President Lyndon Johnston and the entire firearm industry had to conclude that the pristine magic bullet, found on a stretcher at Parkland hospital, did not inflict any of the wounds to John F. Kennedy or Mayor Connally. They all also knew without doubt 1 bullet could not have caused, so didn't cause the neck wound to Kennedy and all the wounds to Mayor Connally, it just wasn't possible,  FOR IT GROSSLY VIOLATED THE LAWS OF PHYSICS. They all knew that it wasn't 1 bullet but at least 2 bullets that inflicted the wounds so bringing their total to 4 bullets and not 3. This proves conclusively they all knew there was more than 1 shooter therefore they all knew it was a conspiracy, so making them all co-conspirators in the "BIG LIE".

It is important to emphasize that Judge Warren and his Warren Commission were exercising jurisdiction over the laws of mathematics when falsely declaring there were 3 instead of at least 4 shots, of the believed 6 shots, fired, they infer, by Oswald. They were also applying jurisdiction over the laws of physics by dealing with ballistics, trajectory and Kennedys' fatal head shot wound. To apply physics requires to apply mathematics and arithmetic; they are intertwined. 

To respect the presumption of innocence of Lee H. Oswald then it required Judge Warren and the Warren Commission and its' verdict to be subject to the common oath "the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth", in their investigating the deceased Oswalds' guilt or innocence which Judge Warren blatantly violated by condemning Oswald as guilty with the "BIG LIE".

As well the 1996 Brennan and High court ruling subjected to the "truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" exposes it as Australias' legal and political establishments' "BIG LIE".  

The fear of a third world thermonuclear war was established in the minds of the American and world public by the Cuban missile crisis in October 1962. A year later this freshly established fear in the minds of the public was used effectively to protect the guilty American political-military establishment and to gain widespread cooperation and acceptance in framing Lee Oswald as A LONE GUNMAN, for the assassination of John F. Kennedy. To protect themselves they falsified and destroyed evidence, botched investigation of the assassination, falsely blamed Oswald, using the fear it might have been the Russians and their KGB, to justify their "BIG LIE" is shown as fallacious. The Communist Soviet Union collapsed and ended in 1989; 12 yrs ago and the truths of the J.F.K. assassination remains locked away to this day and denied to the public. If the Russians killed Kennedy then the release of the evidence in the 1990s would not have led to War. The truth be known the evidence remains locked away until around 2040 so as to protect the guilty American political and military establishment. There was no evidence that the Soviets killed Kennedy but there was lots of evidence the U.S. Political and military establishment and their 12 joint chiefs of staff had and used the C.I.A.; so the threat of a nuclear holocaust was manufactured to protect themselves, so part of their "BIG LIE".

Chief Justice Brennan in 1996 dismissed my application to the High Court acting as the Court of disputed returns, ruling "the High Court doesn't have jurisdiction over the laws of Mathematics or physics". This "BIG LIE" was to corruptly protect the Australian political establishment. Justice Brennan was called upon to apply their arithmetic that Federal parliamentarians were subject to; they had been given the choice between 2 sets of dividing and multiplying by zero and they, by ignoring it, became subject to theirs by default. Justice Brennan wasn't called upon to create nor alter their incorrect set of dividing and multiplying by zero; he and Justice Kirby were to just apply it. Apply: when things or votes are multiplied by zero they cease to exist, proven to be so with theirs (see proof at end of this document), so enforcing upon politicians their dividing and multiplying by zero they'd chosen by their silence, by default.   

The High Court ruling by Justice Brennan was unfit to appeal. To appeal it was to give it credibility and waste my time, energy and money. Rather I applied section 72 of the Australian constitution seeking both houses of parliament remove Justice Brennan from the High court bench on the grounds of mental incapacitation for he had ruled the entire Australian legal and court system out of existence. He had ruled the Judicial, legal and court system can't count, can't add, subtract, divide or multiply. He had ruled away the High Court applying jurisdiction over the Australian constitution for to apply jurisdiction the High Court needs to count, add and subtract etc.. 

Both Houses of Federal Parliament by IGNORING my appeal for Justice Brennans' removal accepted being subject to his ruling, accepted unwittingly the end of the Australian parliamentary system and its' legitimacy. To exist and function as a government Federal parliament implicitly requires jurisdiction to apply the laws of mathematics and physics; it is integral to economics which permeates all of society. How dare Federal parliament ignore so accept and give credibility to the High court and its' Justice Brennans' 1996 ruling amounting to the "BIG LIE".  

In 1998 I again made an application to the High Court acting as the court of disputed returns to have A.C.T. candidates, Bob McMullan, Kate Lundy and Margaret Reid who had stood unlawfully and intended sitting unlawfully in Federal parliament removed. My application was referred by Justice Gammow to a Judge in chambers, a Justice Kirby, who IGNORED my application so confirmed, so accepted and applied the ruling of Chief Justice Brennan of 1996 that the High court and legal system doesn't have jurisdiction to apply the laws of mathematics or physics; ruled they can't count can't add, subtract, divide or multiply.    

On October 27th 2000 I lodged an appeal to the Queen in counsel with the Governor General William Deane who wrongly refused and failed to forward on my appeal. I had informed him I didn't require to gain leave of the High court to appeal to the Queen for it was automatic due to the High court, by way of Justice Brennan and confirmed by Justice Kirby and by Federal parliament, had ruled itself out of existence. Also Governor General Deane refused and failed to respond to section 61 of the Constitution which requires the Governor General to uphold the constitution and laws of the commonwealth. So he blatantly failed in his duties to Queen Elizabeth, to the Commonwealth and to Australia. He IGNORED the ruling by Chief Justice Brennan of 1996 and by ignoring it, accepted it and by "ignoring it" Governor General Deane accepted the loss of his and all future Governor Generals' power to apply  jurisdiction over the Australian Constitution. Consequently the new Governor General Peter Hollingworth doesn't have jurisdiction to apply the constitution and swear into Federal Parliament those candidates of Nov.10th 2001 Federal elections.  

On the 10th May 2001 I lodged my "Appeal to the Queen in counsel" with the British High Commission in Canberra bi-passing the Governor General. They should have automatically forwarded on my appeal to the Queen or returned it to me, either way stating where they or I should send it. In IGNORING it and returning it to me they exercised powers that weren't theirs to exercise; they cast Australia adrift leaving Australia without a government and legal system so reducing Australia to being a country of wildlife. I consider the British High Commission has a duty to the Queen and the commonwealth to report regarding the Queens representative in Australia, the Governor General who acts at her pleasure. They both have failed in their duties to the Queen, the commonwealth and to Australia.           

The "BIG LIE" concept wasn't an original thought of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich, nor was it an original thought of Justice Brennan and the High court for they plagiarized it from Religions that historically are credited with it. The religions didn't cry out and call Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich plagiarists nor threatened to sue for the copyright had expired thousands of years ago and no one religion could claim it was solely their intellectual innovation. Religions wouldn't want their religious followers to consciously realize they are victims of the Religionists "BIG LIE".   

The following reveals astonishingly the brainwashing of billions of people over very long periods of time. Those brainwashed don't know of the extent of their brainwashing. People and society don't realise they have even been brainwashed. A lot would say they couldn't be brainwashed. Any questions or doubts by the High court of Australia or the public regarding the origins of the "BIG LIE" are shown in the following.

Jesus Christ was the richest person of his time and richer than the richest persons of the 21st. century.  He was able to eat the best food, the best. Christ was able to eat 10 course meals any and everyday of the week. He was able to get away from his controlled poverty and indulge himself by feasting for 40 days and 40 nights in the desert, gluttonising himself. The costs wouldn't have been of any concern to him as it was to the rich and powerful of his day. He and his disciples and friends were able to indulge in the best and finest range of wines taking Christs' and his disciples' fancies. Money was never a problem to Jesus Christ. He never had to worry as to where his next meal or drink would come from.

Jesus is presented as being one of the poor; presented as suffering poverty and powerlessness as the ordinary citizen of his and our present day; but his poverty, suffering and powerlessness was controlled, he was able to switch it off when and wherever he chose; unlike us mortals. Jesus's suffering, poverty and powerlessness wasn't real; it was all faked. Only us mortals, not Jesus, would stumble and fall and tire when carrying the burden of a cross to calvary; it was all staged, it was about getting sympathy, about getting people to feel for him and to think of him as a mortal, one of us which he wasn't and never can be. It was about creating and spreading of the "BIG LIE".

Jesus had the best health care possible, he had the best anti-biotics, the best and an unlimited supply. He had what was unavailable to the people of his day, plastic surgery. Jesus would never have suffered ill health. He wouldn't have suffered disfigurement or disabilities. His pain killers were the best and eliminated him from suffering any pain, whereas people of his time suffered agony; but not Jesus. Christs teeth were perfect, utterly perfect for he was extremely privileged by having the best, the best dental care possible; no tooth ache, extractions or dentures for Jesus. Stress wasn't ever suffered by Christ, he would never have suffered emotional stress nor worry. The best tranquilizers were available if he wanted them but he would never ever have needed them. His dying or being killed was nothing, it was all play acting; unlike death and injuries are to us mortals.  

They have put up this Jesus character, this extremely powerful, this extremely rich and absolutely privileged character, this utter fraud, as one of us powerless, helpless, vulnerable, poor, hopeless and suffering mortals which is a hell of a disgusting "BIG LIE".

The rich, the powerful, the privileged and elitists indulge in public deception by peddling charity as the solution to poverty with their association with charities so making out they care about, and love the poor and the powerless, that they care about and love the ordinary person in the street, THEY DON'T. Like Jesus they hand out a few pennies, some scraps, a few crocodile tears and a thimble full of hope and go on and on peddling what they really care about their "BIG LIES".

 Jesus and the rich, the elitists and powerful stand for socialism for themselves and the Corporate Welfare State where the poor and their public money is given to subsidize, bail out and prop up the rich and their businesses and corporations worldwide. Jesus', like all politicians, was politicking for the Kingdom of God, and Kingdoms are comprised of aristocracy, extreme privilege and opulence for the rich few, which isn't heaven on earth for the poor, the helpless and powerless masses but is "pie in the sky"; a "BIG LIE".

Jesus the elitist, privileged and powerful couldn't hang about for long for he risked being found out, he just had to move on as soon as possible. Religions purveying their "BIG LIE" doesn't give legality, credibility nor makes moral the Australian High court and its' Judiciary to also be purveyors of their "BIG LIE" as well.

 I seek the High court acting as the court of disputed returns to enforce their 1996 ruling by Chief Justice Brennan and declare all candidates of the Federal elections of the 10th of November 2001 cannot be sworn legally into Federal parliament by the Governor General Peter Hollingworth for his power to exercise jurisdiction over the "laws of mathematics and physics", a prerequisite to exercise jurisdiction over the Australian constitution, was given up by the previous Governor General Deane. As well those Federal candidates cannot form a government for to form a legitimate and functioning government they also require to apply jurisdiction over the laws of mathematics and physics and that jurisdiction they gave up when both houses of Federal parliament accepted the ruling of Chief Justice Brennan by "ignoring it" and by failing to remove him and shred his ruling.       

Politically John Howard and also Peter Costello and others knew that the public would become aware they had all stood unlawfully at the 1996 Federal elections and again at the 1998 and 2001 elections; upon applying section 72 of the constitution and removing Justice Brennan, Justice Kirby and maybe, but questionably, Justice McHugh and Gammow. It is important for it be recorded and known historically that John Howard is not legally Australias' Prime minister, he never was and never can be. The same goes for Peter Costello, Tony Abott and others.  

I know it would require the full bench of the High court to overturn the 1996 ruling by Justice Brennan and its' confirmation by Justice Kirby by his ignoring of it, and not by a single Judge in chambers. Upon overturning it then the full affects of the application of the dividing and multiplying by zero, past, present and future must be implemented and that would take the full bench of the High court of Australia. Unfortunately I believe the High court of Australia will continue to protect the illegitimate Federal parliament, illegitimate political and legal establishment, will protect the worlds' BUM and cowardly physicists , protect the BUM and cowardly mathematicians allowing them to continue hiding behind their secretaries skirts and support the continuing ignoring of the evidence to the extreme detriment of Australia so frustrating a major fusion spacecraft rocket engine and reactor project getting under way in Australia, with international involvement, for it is dependent upon the cash flow, the royalties from the implementation of my correct dividing and multiplying by zero worldwide.

If this application goes before the full bench of the court of disputed returns then Justice Kirby cannot preside. Also whether Justices McHugh and Justice Gammow should also be excluded is dependent on whether they had made the decision to reject my two previous applications and only sought agreement from another judge in chambers or whether they simply concluded it all required a more in depth assessment by an independent judge with the time to do so.  

The old adage seems to apply "the plans of mice and men" for the full application of the dividing and multiplying was zero was stalled. It's exceedingly funny for they all actually ruled their entire political, court and legal system out of existence themselves. It's hilarious; they did it to themselves. I didn't have to multiply and divide them all by zero after all, I didn't have to do all that work, it's ever so side splittingly funny.     

As well the 1996 ruling by Justice Brennan of the High court "ILLEGALLY" placed the entire Australian Federal and State governments above the law, above the Australian constitution and above the laws of  this universe, that we all are subject to automatically, because the High court and the legal system ruled away its' jurisdiction to hold the Australian governments accountable or answerable to the High court and legal system. As well when Justice Brennan ruled away the High courts jurisdiction over the laws of this universe, laws of mathematics and physics he unwittingly but consequently gave up the High court and legal systems' jurisdiction to apply the Australian constitution as well.

The 1996 Brennan High court ruling was a grossly unacceptable and shameful violation of human rights for humanity has the inalienable given right to apply the laws of this universe and have all governments subject to the laws of this universe, as we all are. We the citizenry have never given up this right and powers; we citizenry were not aware of our given inalienable rights and powers. No government has the right not to be subject to the laws of this universe nor have they the right to remove, nor deny us citizens from exercising our given inalienable rights and powers over them, over Governments and its' Departments, over all courts and all judiciary via the laws of this universe.

The High court has obstructed the course of justice by refusing, failing and ignoring the most profound and significant case to come before it in its' entire existence. I attempted, in 1996 rightly and justifiably so, to question Chief justice Brennan to establish what he understood and didn't understand about the dividing and multiplying by zero conflict. The right decision, the right verdict required to be made there and then and it wasn't. This exposes the legal system as having to be superseded, it has failed pathetically. Not to understand dividing and multiplying by zero is common for historically it has baffled and confused the best minds of the worlds' physicists and mathematicians since its origin by Hindu mathematicians in India in the 9th and 10th century and obviously will affect the judiciarys' state of mind as well. Obviously it wrecked Justice Brennans' brain. 

The outsourcing of the influx into Australia of boat people to pacific island nations for processing exposes the Australian legal system as collapsing for it reveals the legal system is about the lawyers making money, money and more big bucks. It's not about justice which should be the 1st priority. The boat people in Australian detention centers appeals never end, they appeal, appeal to court after court filling those of the legal systems' bank accounts, while the mass of ordinary Australian citizens are denied access to courts, denied the means to get justice. We are confronted with a political and legal system that spends enormous amounts of money, enormous time and energy to stop ordinary Australians getting justice for if 1 gets justice, and deals with their legal problems, they'll all want it. I know this is true because of my 1st hand experience with this obsolete legal system.

To grasp and resolve this mental conflict of zero requires to move to the phenomena, for matter was proven by me to be inanimate intelligence(1993) and infinitely more intelligent than the human brain. So only think on the simple proof using a box, a pallet and the floor realizing that the phenomena itself says that a box can exist on the floor or on a zero pallet(a non existent pallet). So a box can be multiplied by 1(floor) or by 0(pallette) = "1 box" being my answer; their answer is "0" therefore their box and their votes ceased to exist. The phenomena itself is the final arbiter and it says "it is so". This was proven 8 1/2 years ago in 1993 and disgracefully the establishment and its' judiciary stand in its way so shamefully obstructing progress and justice. The judiciary are responsible for wasting 5 1/2 years of that 8 1/2 years. This conflict will not go away until my set of dividing and multiplying by zero, proven to be correct beyond doubt, is accepted and implemented worldwide and copyright dollars paid. 

All those of Federal parliament and the Senate have had their votes multiplied by zero and all future elections giving each of them a total of zero votes each. They will be all sitting illegally, presiding in an illegitimate government and in an illegitimate parliament. 

I've proven conclusively and absolutely, beyond any doubt in 2001, that mathematicians and physicists are wrongly treating zero as a fraction. This conclusion is confirmed by the following:  1 divided by 1/infinity or by 0 = infinite times; so mathematicians are wrongly stating 1/infinity = zero, which is false. 1/infinity has length, breadth, depth and mass whereas " 0" doesn't. Also 1 minus 1 = 0 not 1/infinity. And when 1 is multiplied by 0 it wrongly = 0 for  that zero is wrongly a fraction of 1.

So I require my set of dividing and multiplying by 0, demonstrated and proven in 1993, opposed and frustrated for 8 1/2 yrs, confirmed absolutely correct in 2001, implemented and the "non exclusive" copyright $dollars paid. The 50yr copyright clock is to start from the date of its' implementation and the copyright paid. Mathematicians have no choice but to capitulate, to accept and live with their shame.

Following is the (15th July 93) proof 1 divided by zero = 1 a non action:

1 Tv. divided by 1 customer   = 1 Tv. SOLD  (is an action)

1 Tv. divided by 0 customers = 1 Tv. UNSOLD (is a non action)

(1 divided by 0 = infinite times means the object ceases to exist by absolute fragmentation.)

-------------------- 

Following is proof that 1 multiplied by 0 = 1 a non action: (* = multiply)

                        5    *     3               =     15

                        0    *     2                =       0

                       2    *     1                =       2

                       1    *     0                =       1 (on the floor = on zero pallets)

                                TOTAL         =     18 BOXES

ATTENTION: my correct dividing and multiplying by zero is under international non exclusive copyright. I gave 75% ownership to be owned by the public internationally independently of the State. Also it’s subject to the statement "facts in their true perspective" which gives people power over what they own………….

The brain is shown by one of N.A.S.A.s' staff, in a documentary on going to Mars, to function differently in a state of weightlessness for the brain searches for things upon something, upon tables, on the floor, on a shelf. In outer space things float about in a state of weightlessness so the brain has to adjust to looking for, searching for, things being "not on something" but "on nothing" floating about defined by me as being in a position of zero. This must be why mathematicians, physicists and earthlings have gotten wrong in the 9^th century, and maintained wrong for 12 hundred years, their defective dividing and multiplying by zero. On earth where objects are subject to gravity their objects, psychologically, can't exist in a position of zero, for everything is on something. When a bird is in flight it's said the bird is on the wing. Mathematicians can't possibly ever intentionally multiply by zero, it must have been somehow forbidden, but if they do it must be unknowingly via their defective and flawed algebra.

 If they do multiply by zero then the object ceases to exist, but to the proponents of the incorrect dividing and multiplying by zero objects don't exist in the 1st place in a position of zero; so it follows they never multiply by zero, but if they do it wrongly verifies the object didn't exist originally. 

A hot air balloon floating is in a position of zero; it's not on something, so 1 balloon multiplied by 0(not on something) = 1 balloon. It would be interesting to put, in person, my dividing and multiplying by zero that has objects existing in zero positions to astronauts, that are physicists and mathematicians, and see if they readily perceive it, or react in a hostile, arrogant and imbecilic manner, as non astronaut mathematicians and physicists in universities have and still do 8 1/2 years later.

Mathematicians wrongly made an arbitrary decision, endorsed by the unscientific, incompetent and corrupt concept of the "Is' HAVE IT" 12 hundred years ago, a decision that they hadn't proved and have never proven ever since that established their incorrect dividing and multiplying by zero. To this very day they can't put up, refuse to put up, fail to put up credible arithmetic and apply it demonstrating their dividing and multiplying by zero actually functioning correctly. All they can put up are the claims that they are experts, world authorities, and super duper mega know all bastards. They all are terrified of having to admit and accept being wrong, wrong for so long, wrong for 12 hundred years, publicly.

On the 19th Dec Justice Callinan rejected my petition requiring me to submit an expartee application to another justice for acceptance or rejection. My Exparte affidavit follows: