Website: http://home.pacific.net.au/~t_rout

They criminally on the 24^th July 03 disallowed my Appeal of their 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th Apr. 03 rulings. These Judiciary have committed criminally insane acts upon criminally insane acts.

My appeal was legitimately based upon the grounds their rulings being criminally insane.

Also how dare these Judiciary make Snap, Snap, Snap decisions and impose their Snap, Snap, Snap stupidity and criminal insanity upon me and the public. Snap, Snap, Snap decisions are prone to be wrong and can have short and long term extreme detriment. Appealing Judicial rulings on the grounds they are Snap, Snap, Snap decisions are also credible grounds of appeal.

I avoid making Snap, Snap, Snap decisions for that reason and I and the public must reject the Judiciarys’ Snap, Snap, Snap, shallow, superficial and erroneous prone decisions particularly for Judiciary knowingly and deliberately dump the "Truth, the Whole Truth" and abandon "Reasoning" so as to criminally supplant "Words and Numbers of Legislation" upon us. They delusionally act as though they have implemented the law; but they have not. We the public are crazily subjected to Judiciary who by switching their reasoning off and on become confused rendering them incapable of comprehending and understanding what it is all about! To Reason is to put the facts into their true perspective, relative to the phenomena so establishing the Truth so as to gain an understanding and comprehension of the Truth. This is mandatory. But we are subjected to suffering the Judiciaries’ carnage of criminal idiocy and criminal insanity long term and we don’t have to!

Scientists, Real Scientists, have to acknowledge and accept what has been proven and so too do Judiciary. But the 5 Judiciary of the Supreme Court and 7 judges of the High Court, re a related matter, have knowingly and intentionally refused to acknowledge and accept what has been proven so rendering their rulings false statements. This proves them guilty of Obstructing and Perverting the Course of Justice. Their corrupt, insane and perjurous rulings must not stand.

I have never won any case before the Judicial Court System over the past 25 years. I had been before the Family Court many times which is also an insane place filled with mad judges that drive fathers mad and to kill their children and commit suicide. I have lost count of the numbers of children murdered. Years and years ago I got into the high 20s or 30s and I consider the mad Family court has killed them. There has been 5 more children murdered by their fathers in the last few weeks. Those Family Court Judiciary have to be made answerable and accountable and readily and easily removed. Their immortal tenure must go.

I have represented myself before the High Court in 1996, 98, 2001-2-3. Is it me or the Judiciary? It isn’t me because I don’t go into court for the fun of it; nor to violate people, I go into court because of Justification. My case against the ABC clearly shows why I and enormous numbers of people lose in this Anti-Justice Judicial court system. Judiciary knowingly, deliberately and criminally commit and collude in perjury; commit and collude in obstructing and perverting the course of justice with their lawyer mates so as to rule prejudicially in favour of the Rich and Powerful and against ordinary Poor and Powerless citizens. So they obstruct, hinder, deny and deprive citizens of justice so as to insanely "STOP" people getting justice. This is a Anti-Justice system.

The concept of justification is of paramount importance and a fundamental foundation of justice. The Judicial Court System is criminally and insanely discarding justification. Judiciary cannot establish the Truth, the Whole Truth with their ignoring of and discarding of the evidence and proof of justification. But the Judiciary are; they are horrifyingly doing just that!

This, the Supreme Court Judiciary have criminally done, regarding my justifiable right and necessity to protect and defend my scientific and intellectual achievements from theft and plagiarism. To do this then I was justifiably required to bring the ABCs’ Catalyst program before the court on the 29^th Aug 02 and be given an injunction on the program. On proving justification, which I did, then I justifiably don’t pay the ABCs’ legal costs but it is obvious the Judicial Court system is blatantly violating the Rights of justification by their loser pays. But I didn’t lose; relative to the Truth then I win, which means I win on merit, so how come I lose and my proof of justification is ignored. Justification was established at the beginning and therefore is supposed to prevent it from being subjugated and/or discarded at some later time, as the 5 judges of the Supreme Court have criminally done.

Justification must stand and continue to exist in spite of the Judiciary of the Supreme Court who have displayed their regressed minds and lower intelligence with their de-evolution to when the human brain could not perceive nor comprehend the existence of the concept of justification.

My applications to the High Court, acting as the Court of Disputed returns, in 1996, 1998, 2001-2-3 were rejected on those occasions on the basis they were not justified. Justification was again obviously violated, perverted and discarded for my applications to the High Court were and are justified; but this justification was corruptly and insanely rejected. That criminal insanity is revealed by Chief Justice Gleeson in 2002 rejecting my application on the grounds it was Unintelligible and was confirmed as Unintelligible on appeal by Justices’ Kirby and Haydon on the 14^th March 2003. They didn’t prove it was Unintelligible, they just say it is, and any Judiciary of any court anywhere at any time can say the same to any citizen as though that proves justification of their conclusion, it doesn’t. Judiciary are actually making false statements, this is one of them, and befitting persons with I.Qs of 50 or lower. They are knowingly, criminally and unashamedly doing it. It’s a policy of Obstructing and Perverting the Course of Justice with the end result justifying the means. Judiciary are committing Perjury and not being charged, which proves Judiciary are above the law.

What is this Law that we are having criminally supplanted upon us? It is presented as being impartial, but it isn’t. It is imposed upon us as though it’s devoid of evil, but it isn’t; as though it is justice, but it isn’t; and that insanity doesn’t exist in relation to the Law or to those criminally supplanting it upon us, but it does. The Judiciary just want the citizenry to acquiesce and accept their Criminal supplanting of Words and Numbers of Legislation upon us; but we must reject it.

This thing called The Law is purveyed as though it is Amoral, as though it is void of evil, corruption, and insanity but it definitely is not. And by it being amoral it is unquestionable and unchallengeable, but it is. It is imposed upon us as though it is justice itself. Since the "Words of Legislation and Constitutions" are not Amoral then everything contained in them or left out is legitimately questioned and challenged by applying the Amoral statement "the facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena".

The Universes’ Laws and it’s Laws of Maths, Physics and Chemistry are Amoral. Earthquakes, Tornadoes and Droughts are Amoral and the death and destruction they reek are not called murder, vandalism or evil nor insane. But Words of Legislation must not be allowed to continue to hide behind this veil of Amorality. Nor the Judiciary to hide behind words of adournment, words used to deceive the citizenry such as impartiality, honour, integrity and Justice a word they hypocritically label themselves with as though they are for justice, but they are not. They are about criminally supplanting Words and Numbers of legislation upon us.

Judiciary to implement the Criminal insanity of the State makes them, the Judiciary Criminally Insane not Honourable, not persons of Integrity, not of and for Justice.

Judiciary have as good as immortal tenure and it has to go. Their immortal tenure creates and stimulates their stupidity, their criminal arrogance and their disregard of, and unaccountability for their mentally degenerate, corrupt and criminally insane rulings. You won’t find pride in their work.

Reasoning is my forte and it isn’t theirs. I have made and continue to make profound scientific achievements through reasoning and the Judiciary’s reasoning is extremely bad. It is pathetic.

I have stated previously to the Federal governments’ "Higher Education at the Crossroads" program that reasoning examinations must be included into the education system and made the paramount exam, such, to fail it is to fail outright. It would eliminate the educated idiots from the middle, upper classes and ultra rich, of which there are many, from passing through universities and their obtaining degrees, Ph.D’s and their being inflicted upon us vulnerable and powerless citizens. Idiots from the working classes don’t get to universities due to being poor. Most, if not all, Judiciary would fail reasoning examinations; they are that bad.

They who are irrational cannot learn, understand and progress through reasoning. The Political, Government, Judicial and Police are automatically under oath for they all demand of us citizens all to tell, inform and supply them with the Truth, the Whole Truth which they are to acknowledge, accept and apply reasoning to to arrive at sane and just conclusions.   

The statement "Facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena" is the foundations of reasoning and proven, by me, to be a Law of this universe, "through my superior reasoning powers", in January in 1997. Since that statement makes or breaks theories and laws of this universe then that makes it, itself, a law of this universe. So all Judiciary’s rulings made subject to that statement is in the world publics’ interest. It gives power to the individual citizen.

"Power to the people" is only achieved and maintained by power being exercised by the lone citizen.

Division of the Executive powers of the State and the Judiciarys’ powers are purported to have created an Independent Judiciary; this is false. The division of powers is to separate the Judiciary from the public allowing the Judiciary to be unaccountable, corrupt and able to supplant criminal insanity and any other foul crap upon us powerless and helpless citizens. The public appealing to the political establishment and/or their political representatives is met with "We are powerless" due to Judicial Independence. But the real result is that an horrendous crime has been committed against the public by leaving us citizens powerless against the corrupt, incompetent, and the criminal insanity of Judiciary.

It needs to be questioned as to how ex High Court Judge, Gerard Brennan came to be the Chancellor of the University of Technology, Sydney. He has to be about the most unfit and unworthy person. He in 1996 made the criminally insane ruling that the High Court doesn't have jurisdiction to apply the laws of mathematics and physics that obstructed and perverted the course of justice that has obstructed the research and development of my fusion spacecraft rocket engine project in Australia, designed to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms. It proves he is unfit and his findings are without credibility regarding his conclusions while being one of those inquiring into the alleged fraudulent research of Professor Hall from the University of New South Wales. Again his appointment to being the Chancellor of a University must have been another corrupt political appointment.    

My attempt to have 7 judges of the High Court held accountable for their mental incompetence following their 1998, 2001-2-3 supporting of the mentally incapacitated ruling by Chief Justice Gerard Brennan in 1996, that the High Court of Australia doesn’t have jurisdiction to apply the Universes’ laws of Mathematics or Physics, was ignored by those of Federal Parliament who were responsible to act. It proves the Judicial and Political Establishments are above the Law and above the Laws of this Universe that we are all obviously subject to. I applied "Section 72 of the Constitution" which is for the removal of judiciary on the grounds of mental incapacitation. It takes the Governor General with a joint sitting of both houses of parliament voting for the removal of a judge, to remove a judge, which reveals this absurd immortal tenure which requires Divine intervention with an act of God to remove Judges from the Bench. Whereas a Prime Minister can be removed and replaced through a leadership spill by a few of the party, with a "Here today and Gone tomorrow" necessity. We the citizen must also be able to remove Judiciary easily, readily with a Here today and Gone Tomorrow agenda through their rulings and decisions being subject to the Amoral statement the "facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena". We the citizens would be able to compel the political establishment for the 1^st time to actually act and actually remove judiciary over their incompetent and criminally insane rulings and decisions by having them shredded and shredded and repeatedly shredded.

(i.) Shall be appointed by the Governor-General in Council:

(ii.) Shall not be removed except by the Governor-General in Council, on an address from both Houses of the Parliament in the same session, praying for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity:"

So the Constitution then importantly reveals the Constitutional necessity of, but failure of, the Judiciary to put their reasoning of how they got from point A to point B, openly on the table for all to see. This would empower and enable citizens to have Judicial and Court rulings challenged and shredded on the grounds of it’s "mental incapacitation" due to their rulings being corrupt or criminally insane. These are the grounds of my Appeal against the 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th Apr 03 hearings. This puts the importance and the "POWER" on the "Reasoning" and the resulting rulings being relative to the "Truth, the Whole Truth". This justifiably removes the credibility and "POWER" of the rulings from the person, office and Judiciary. This would also show, importantly, if Judiciary credibly and justly reasoned their way from A to B and didn’t corruptly and insanely jump from A to B by using Words of Legislation, for to do so is to commit a criminal act.

To hold up words of legislation as being the law and impose it by supplanting it upon the population and individual citizens is criminal. Why is it grossly criminal?

Words of legislation imposed requires the perverting and/or abandonment of "Reasoning" and the "Truth, the Whole Truth" which is evidence tested and put into context by subjecting the evidence to the "facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena". This is the subjecting of the evidence to the foundations of reasoning so establishing the "Truth, the Whole Truth". To discard Reasoning and the Truth, the whole Truth, as Judiciary and Courts are commonly and criminally doing, then Court hearings are a waste of time and money.

The Court hearings of the 29^TH Aug 02, 11^th April 03 and 24^th July 03 were criminally a waste of time, money and resources. The outcome was already known and decided before any of the court hearings, because they had stacked deck, marked the cards, and were taking the pool win or lose. Any and everything I were to say would be ignored as being irrelevant for the criminal supplanting of Words of Legislation was to be imposed: Injunctions are not given to the Poor and Powerless against the Rich and Powerful therefore I the Poor and Powerless "LOSE" therefore since I "LOSE" then I the Poor and Powerless are to pay the Rich and Powerful ABCs’ legal costs. This Judicial scam, this criminal insanity and crime against humanity is not to stand.

Words to maintain their true and common meaning and be understood must be interpreted according to the phenomena from which they came to exist. Judiciary and Lawyers interpret words to mean whatever they want them to mean which results in words of legislation and the Constitution losing their true meaning. It proves Judiciary and Lawyers do not understand Legislation or the Constitution. The words: Justice, Honour, Impartiality and Truth are only words of deception and adornments of the criminally insane Anti Justice Judicial system.

The criminal act of awarding of the ABCs costs against me on the 11^th April 03 exposes these gross crimes by the Supreme Court Judiciary and their collusion with the ABCs Law firms. If the ABCs "Perjured Notice of Motion" of the 11^th April 03 was justified then it could not be brought until after the expiry date of my requirement to bring on my "Action for Damages" which is a period of 3 years so making it the 29^th of August 2005. I am now in the criminally insane situation of the ABCs Lawyers who now can send me bankrupt leaving me with as near to nothing so destroying and undermining my means of bringing an "Action for Damages" against them. This proves absolutely, without doubt, the course of justice has been obstructed and perverted on the 11^th April and 24^th July 03. I and anyone else would now have their money to pay a Lawyer to bring an "Action for Damages" taken leaving me and others broke and having to represent ourselves in a corrupt, prejudiced and Anti-Justice Judicial Court system. It is paramount that my "Action for Damages" goes before a jury and all appeals must also go before a jury and NOT Judiciary. The 29^th Aug 2002 hearing saw the Judiciary openly admitting, so proving, the Judicial court system is massively prejudiced in favour of the "Rich and Powerful" and is extremely prejudiced against the "Poor and Powerless and me" by me being unjustly ordered to pay the "Rich and Powerful’s" legal costs.

People going before Judiciary must also sense as I do, but not realise and be able to prove as I can and do, that Judiciary don’t understand what the case before the court is all about. The onus of proof is upon the Judiciary but they prove little to nothing. Judiciary under their Anti-Justice System don’t require to understand anything because they conceal their incompetent, criminal reasoning of how they got from position A to position B. They conceal they have discarded the "Truth, the Whole Truth", which is criminal, and conceal they have abandoned "Reasoning", which is an insane act, so as to criminally and insanely supplant "Words and Numbers of Legislation" upon us as though they have and are upholding the law, but they are not!

Legislation cannot and is not to alter, pervert nor abandon the "Truth, the Whole Truth" and/or "Reasoning", to do so strips the Words and Numbers of Legislation of credibility and Legality. It is mandatory that all rulings and decisions are relative to the "Truth, the Whole Truth" by way of being subject to the foundations of "Reasoning" which is the "facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena", which is an amoral law of this Universe.

Are the Rulings and Decisions by the Supreme Court Judiciary relative to the "Truth, the Whole Truth" by "Reasoning" regarding my case "Rout V the ABC"? The answer is "NO." Therefore criminal acts have been committed by the Supreme Court Judiciary. The Anti-Justice Judicial system commits criminally insane hypocrisy by demanding the "Truth, the Whole Truth" with the threat of fines and/or jail and they, the Judiciary, then commits gross criminal acts of "Perjury" by picking and choosing or by abandoning of the "Truth, the Whole Truth", and finally make a criminal false statement in the form of their ruling. This is done to accommodate the Criminal Supplanting of Words and Numbers of legislation and their unjust Reasoning and Rulings. Therefore Judiciary are reasoning from false and perverted premises and this obscenely is called The Law. They do not have the Moral or Ethical nor Legal right to ask for, nor demand the Truth from anyone without their reasoning and conclusions being relative to the Truth, the Whole Truth.

It is contradictory and absurd to expect Judiciary’s brains to think constructively and progress through Reasoning and the Truth, the Whole Truth when their minds are absorbed with their daily, yearly thinking predominantly of how to fabricate the credibility and legality of their criminally insane conclusions and rulings. Inevitably being irrational and criminally insane becomes normal for Judiciary.

Rupert Murdoch and his Medias’ successful stand against Max Stuart being hung ended there in 1959 and hasn’t gone on and solved the real problem. The criminal insanity of the Judicial Court system has continued with rulings not being relative to the "Truth, the Whole Truth" through the perjurous discarding of the "Truth, the Whole Truth" and the abandoning of "Reasoning" to enable the criminal supplanting of "Words of Legislation" as the Law.

The Media and the ABC, and its’ Chairperson Donald McDonald and the Board, are beneficiaries’ of this Criminal insanity and Crime against Humanity of the Supreme Court Judiciary. Obviously the Media and ABC cannot be beneficiaries and also condemn the Rulings of the 29^th Aug 02, 11^th April 03 and 24^th July 03. This of course is a violation of the publics’ interest and of the ABC so the entire ABC Board should resign or be sacked.

An English couples’ 2 babies died of cot death, they stopped breathing. The mother, Sally Clark, after the death of her 2^nd baby Harry, was charged and convicted of murdering both her babies and was sentenced to life in prison. The evidence used to convict her was presented as the odds of both her babies dying of cot death was 73 million to 1. This evidence hadn’t been subjected to the statement, Facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena to establish the Truth, the Whole Truth, which is required to be done. This evidence of 73 million to 1 makes it long odds on to being certain she murdered her two babies. 73 million to 1 was wrongly based on the 2 cot deaths being independent of each other which was false due to the 2 babies being genetically related through having the same parents and same family environment so were not independent of each other. Also it was presented by a Doctor, a person with qualifications from a University, referred to by the Media as an "Expert", a Professor Sir Roy Meadow, the 1^st President of the Royal College of Pediatricians and Child health with a load of letters after his name. This, I state, proves that in the end it is all based upon the Rulings and Decisions being relative to the Truth, the Whole Truth and subject to the foundations of reasoning the "Facts in their true perspective, relative to the Phenomena", and cannot be based upon qualifications, position, status, nor Words of Legislation. The proving of justification before and after the fact by the Judiciary and the State is of paramount importance. To be relative to Words of Legislation instead of relative to the phenomena is an act of perjury and is to pervert the course of justice due to the abandoning and perverting of the Truth, the Whole Truth and Reasoning. The correct odds were adjusted to 100 to 1 and not 73 million to 1 in the Sally Clark case and she was acquitted and has since been released after spending 3 years in a U.K. jail. I have used data from the 2003 BBCs program "Cot Death Mothers; The Witch Hunt".

My grandson, when a few months old, just stopped breathing or it had slowed dramatically on 2 separate occasions, but fortunately my daughter became aware of it both times while she was nursing him late in the evening, he was twice hospitalised and survived with no ill effects. Her younger brother George, of a different father, was found dead in his cot about 15 years ago when he was only 1 year old. Babies do stop breathing! The question is how and why?

For the next three hours, Vivien Thomas stood quietly at Blalock's right shoulder, watching carefully as the surgeon's scalpel and needles moved in and out, and offering helpful suggestions. Because of Thomas's surgical expertise, and his exhaustive knowledge of the procedure, Dr Blalock insisted that he be present for the first 100 operations. According to McCabe, if any operating room staff member attempted to move into the space behind Blalock's right shoulder, the surgeon would deliver the quick admonishment, "Only Vivien is to stand there."

Like Vivien Thomas I don’t have Tertiary play school labels to hide behind but we both are required to rely upon our abilities and stand on our achievements. But I have large numbers of persons that are about denying me credit, recognition and remuneration as well as plagiarise my achievements. The ABC and the media are creating Courtesy of the Media plagiarists.

The man who solved the problem of longitude, in the 16^th century, was a simple carpenter. He, John Harrison, built an amazing series of large sea going clocks set to keep Greenwich meantime and he out did all those supposedly more educated and qualified to do the job including clockmakers. They all failed whereas John Harrison a simple carpenter succeeded.

Like John Harrison I have had to take on the heavyweights, in my case I’ve taken on the heavyweights of Physics, Mathematics, Cosmology and now Law and the Judiciary and I’ve out done and outdoing them all.

The Heavyweights of cosmology, Physics and Mathematics have had 10 years, since the 9^th May 93, to acknowledge and accept my destruction of their Big Bang theory. As Scientists it is mandatory that they all do and their failure to acknowledge and accept my scientific proofs means the demise of their intellectual and scientific credibility as scientists all the way to the gutter. They all are doing it to themselves by their continuing to peddle the Big Bang Theory instead of moving forward by acknowledging and accepting of my Perpetual Universe, and other proven scientific data, which I can’t get published due to me being blacklisted. I don’t intend to wait and accept posthumous credit and recognition.

Tamara Davis, Ph.D. student, was personally given the opportunity, several months ago, to free herself from being a courtesy of the media plagiarist but she has chosen to remain a plagiarist through her silence. Dr Micheal Murphy and Dr Webb will now be given their 1 chance to free themselves from being Courtesy of the Media plagiarists.

I used my higher intelligence and superior reasoning powers to be 1^st to evidence in 1990-2, and prove in 1997 the speed of light is alterable and controllable. Whereas Paul Davies Prof., Dr John Webb and his NSW University team through serendipity stumbled upon, by accident, some light spectrum data they wrongly suspect is related to the possibility of the slowing down of the speed of light throughout the universe. But it was stated it was not credible and will most probably go away by one of the team, a Dr Lineweaver in the ABCs Catalyst program on 29^th Aug 02.

"Time, time, what is time? Swiss manufacture it, French hoard it, Italians squander it, Americans say time is money, Hindus’ say time does not exist, You know what I say, I say time is a crook!" So says Peter Lorre acting as Mr O’Hara in a Humphrey Bogart Film "Beat the Devil".

I am also 1^st to perceive and prove, the evidence of proof is blatantly obvious to me and simple to prove by any mathematician, that there is infinitely more energy contained within the motion of the expanding Universe of space itself than is contained in all of the matter and energy throughout the entire Universe. Also I am 1^st to prove that energy has been, and is being created, from nothing right before all their very eyes, proven in Jan 1994. All physicists and cosmologists are compelled to acknowledge and accept this as proven and their silence and failure to do so declares them all as not having the scientific abilities nor intelligence to comprehend and understand it. It is a declaration they are Bum scientists and I as their intellectual and scientific superior. They stupidly think they all can hide behind their silence.

Likewise, Judiciary must acknowledge and accept what has been proven, for it is mandatory, and their failure to do so declares them as unfit to establish the Truth or to Reason nor to make decisions relative to the Truth, the Whole Truth.

The Judicial Court system by discarding reasoning, which they commonly and incessantly do, then they cannot progress through reasoning as I have done in the following few paragraphs.

Distances between Galaxies are increasing due to the Universe of space expanding and the distances increase faster and greater the further out these near to stationary Galaxies are. But if the outward speeds of all these galaxies was increasing and increasing then their Mass would have to also be increasing and increasing, but isn’t. The increasing Mass would cause the Galaxies gravity to be increasing and increasing, due to gravity being a product of Space reacting to the Mass of the objects within it, but isn’t. Therefore since the Mass and Gravity isn’t increasing then it proves Space itself is carrying galaxies outwards and Space itself in doing this proves Space itself is being created. This obviously proves space itself is being created by a Supernatural omnipresent being making me the 1^st and only person to prove the existence of God. Space is not coming into existence from the exploding Big Bang of a Primeval Atom. If it was then the speed of light would have to be slowing and slowing due to, I state, being relative to the density of space itself that also would have to be falling and falling as space expanded in the expanding Universe, but it isn’t. This latter data, of mine, I applied destroying the Big Bang theory on the 9^th May 1993. I am 1^st to prove the existence of the Universes’ 4th dimension, the density of space itself; for space cannot warp or bend nor expand without having density, to which the speed of light is relative. This proves I, and only I, am 1^st to prove the speed of light is alterable and controllable up or down in a vacuum, without impeding its' motion.

I am 1^st to state Einsteins’ contraction of the length of a spacecraft as it’s speed increases also occurs later with the compacting of width and depth caused by the 4th dimension resulting in an ever increasing mass, density and gravity.

I am again 1^st. , First to realise and evidence through reasoning that gravity and density increases along with the increasing Mass as an objects’ speed increases resulting finally in the speeding spacecraft imploding becoming a singularity; a Black Hole.

I am also 1^st to perceive and apply the increased mass of a object, through its’ increased directional or rotational speed, as causing an increase in the gravity of Galaxies. The Dark Matter theorists are using a gravitational deficiency of Galaxies to falsely use as proof that undetectable and invisible Dark Matter exists. This is falsely used to claim approx. 1% to 5% of the entire matter within the universe is visible and detectable and approx. 95% to 99% is undetectable and invisible Dark Matter. This absurd claim is made to give credibility to the Big Crunch theory by creating the enormous amounts of matter and its’ subsequent gravity that is required for the Big Crunch to happen which I have proven can’t and won’t ever happen.

My altering and controlling of the speed of light within the chambers of my fusion spacecraft rocket engine, designed to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms, is possible but it is not possible to alter the density of space itself through out the Universe, which would be necessary, to enable travel faster than the 300,000 k.p.sec.. We have to accept and be happy with the slowing of time through high speed in relation to space travel.

There is incorrect data being released publicly of experiments that have slowed down the speed of light. One claim is to have slowed it to a few k.p.sec. Another claim of a stationary electron from freezing. But the public are not told that: The true and accepted constant speed of light itself has not been reduced or altered." Not told, the light that has been slowed down was slowed through impeding its’ movement just as light is impeded as it passes through the atmosphere; but the true speed of light itself has not been altered. Neither does the impeding of light prove travel faster than the speed of light is possible. To alter the speed of light requires the altering of what the speed of light is relative to and that is my achievement, the 4^th dimension. I am 1^st historically, through my intellectual and scientific superiority, to prove the "true and constant speed of light is alterable and controllable in a vacuum, without impeding its’ movement. Scientists and physicists in failing to enlighten the public of the difference are dishonest and Bum Scientists. The Media are again publishing incorrect scientific data with no regard for what they cause people and students to wrongly believe.

All scientists stating the speed of light is alterable fail mentally to comprehend that they have to make the speed of light relative to something but they can’t because the Big Bang Universe is 3 dimensional. Whereas my Perpetual Universe is 4 dimensional with the speed of light relative to its’ 4^th dimension the density of space itself. This again proves I am the 1^st and only person to have proven the speed of light is alterable and controllable.

This reveals the absolute importance of reasoning and shows progress through reasoning and the constant discarding of and perverting of reasoning by judiciary is a criminally insane act.

Justice and the Law have to be and must be one and the same. But justice and the Law are not the same and since they are not one and the same then they are divided and being divided they will collapse. Of course Justice is first to go and that is demonstrated and proven with my case against the ABC which reveals massive prejudice in favour of the Rich and Powerful with extreme prejudice against the Poor, Powerless and me. It is common practice for Justice to always be subjugated and discarded so as to criminally supplant Words of legislation upon us, with the Judicial Court, legal and political systems acting as though Justice has been done, but they know it hasn’t. What we citizens are subjected to is a system of Anti-Justice that allows the Words of Legislation to be criminally supplanted upon us citizens. Truth and Reasoning gets in the way so it must be discarded which stimulates the Judicial Court and legal system to cover it up by going through the motions that they are about Truth and Justice and that they, the Judiciary and Courts are Honourable and Impartial, but they are not. What it proves is that the Judicial Court system is guilty of Massive Criminally Insane Hypocrisy.

Judiciary to implement prejudice, as they do, makes Judiciary prejudiced. Judiciary to implement corruption, as they do, makes Judiciary corrupt. Judiciary to implement injustice, as they do, makes Judiciary and courts unjust and dishonourable. Judiciary to commonly pervert and discard the truth, as they do, commonly commit Perjury and Obstruct and Pervert the course of Justice. Judiciary to commonly and criminally pervert and discard Reasoning, as they do, proves them to be insane. Judiciary to commonly abandon the Evidence, Truth and Reasoning, as they do, proves them to be criminally insane.

Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge have been each sentenced to 3 years jail by a Judge. It is being stated publicly by the Federal and State Political Establishment that it is unjustly severe. They are all unknowingly saying that the decision to jail them for 3 years is not relative to the Truth that is derived from subjecting the evidence to the foundations of Reasoning which is the "Facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena". This is what Pauline Hanson, David Ettridge and the Federal and State political Establishment wants for Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge but definitely nothing less for themselves and the Rich and Powerful. But definitely it’s not for the ordinary citizens; not for the Poor and Powerless or me!

The State of Queensland via the Qld Electoral Commission demanded the Truth, the Whole Truth from Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge and the One Nation Party so it follows that Pauline Hanson and David Ettridges’ conviction and sentence has to be relative to the Truth, the Whole Truth. Is it?

The 3 Judges who presided over the ridiculous 24^th July 03 court hearing that I justifiably refused to attend had to find only one reason for my appeal to go ahead, only one. But they in dismissing my appeal wrongly declared the rulings of 29^th Aug 02 and 11^th April 03 were absolutely correct, therefore there were absolutely no doubts because if there were any doubts then I must be given the benefit of that doubt and therefore my Appeal must go ahead and not be dismissed as it was to accommodate the Rich and Powerful and the Anti-Justice System.

My appeal hearing could not be justifiably dismissed for there were numerous proven reasons justifying my appeal. The 3 judges have criminally discarded this evidence and criminally supplanted it with Words of legislation in the form of insane rules of the court criminally giving legality to their Perjury and to the Obstructing and Perverting of the Course of Justice.

The 3 judges required only 1 justified reason, just one of many provided, to allow my appeal to go ahead. One reason was, the proven fact, that my originating application of the 28^th Aug 02 was to be supplanted with a Judicial criminal scam the next day. The court knew this therefore negligently allowed it to go before the court. The simple plain truth is I had a health care card that enabled the waiver of the filing fee, which was a declaration I am "Poor and Powerless". Therefore the Court knew before the Court hearing that I could not put up any monies or collateral to cover any losses incurred by the ABC on my being granted the injunction. Therefore the Court knew before the court hearing the Injunction would not be granted because of my poor financial position. That is why it was refused in the court the next day. Therefore the Court was negligent and liable for the ABCs’ legal costs and not me. The ABC has wrongfully and criminally sought to have me pay their legal costs rather than the negligent Court. That was stated clearly in my 24^th July letter to the Supreme Court Registrar and Judiciary so they had their own criminal negligence justifying my appeal which they criminally disallowed.

There was also the Judicial criminal scam of the "proven" massive prejudice by the Supreme Court Judiciary, Miles and Harper, in favour of the Rich and Powerful and the "proven" extreme prejudice against the Poor, Powerless and Me by the Rich and Powerful ABC’s costs being awarded against me. This exposed it as a crime against humanity with the Media the beneficiaries.

It is horrifying to think that for all this time the Judiciary and Lawyers have had the Words of section 72 of the Constitution to use to prevent themselves from implementing the criminality and insanity of the Words of Legislation of the State upon the Poor, Powerless and me.

Section 72 of the Constitution has never, according to my parliamentary inquiries, ever been used to remove a Judge. Nor has it ever been used to destroy and shred the corrupt, and criminal insanity of Judicial rulings. These rulings must be shredded and discarded by them being subjected to the Amoral foundations of Reasoning the "Facts in their True perspective relative to the phenomena".

The concept of Independent is a concept that is perverted by the independent whoever corruptly independently supporting, in this case, the Judicial decisions. But to overcome this corrupt and perverted Independence then its’ Reasoning and Conclusions require also to be subjected to the "Facts in their true perspective, relative to the phenomena". The bias, prejudice and criminal insanity can be rejected even though the Independent assessment appeared Independent.

The Independent Judiciary independently support the Political and State Establishment as they are functionaries of the State imposing their Words and Will. Judicial independence is Bullshit! They are independent of the public rendering the public powerless and helpless against the corrupt and criminal insanity of the Judicial Court System.

Sanity is not determined by words of Legislation but determined according to the Facts in their True Perspective, relative to the phenomena" which is the final officialdom. If Judicial rulings and decisions are not assessed and shredded independently of the judiciary subject to the Facts in their true perspective relative to the phenomena then Judiciary are exercising absolute power, or as good as……Also it proves Judiciary are above the law.

I sought, I seek and I demand the removal of numerous Judges of the High Court on the grounds of their mental incapacitation, under section 72 of the Constitution. They and all Judiciary that refuse or fail to acknowledge, accept and implement the Universes’ Laws; its’ laws of Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry etc. etc. as The Law are incompetent and criminally insane. The Laws of this Universe dictates what is Truth and Sanity so it proves they are unfit to preside over anything. So it is Mandatory for Judiciary to acknowledge and accept what is proven so they can establish and understand the Truth, the Whole Truth. It also proves everything is subject to its’ foundations and the Universes’ Laws are the foundations of everything which proves absolutely and conclusively that Words of Legislation are subject to the Universes Laws of Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry etc.. I have proven the Laws of this Universe are the Law in Australia and Worldwide whether the Political and/or Judicial establishments love or loathe it; they all are to acquiesce.

The Political Establishment having refused and failed, by ignoring it, to remove judges from the High Court bench is one thing, but it is another thing to allow their corrupt and criminally insane rulings and decisions, which obviously have no credibility nor legality, to stand and/or be implemented. Only by citizens having judicial rulings and decisions shredded independently of the Judiciary will the Political Establishments finally respond and remove Judiciary.

I am confronted with requiring to Appeal to the High Court and have the incompetent and criminally insane ruling(s) of the Supreme Court overturned. But I have already proven the High Court Judiciary are also Mad and Corrupt.

This causes me to have to bring an Action for Damages against, not only the 5 Judiciary of the Supreme Court, but also against the 4 Judges of the High Court, Brennan, Gleeson, Kirby and Haydon. As well the 3 judges who referred my petitions to go before these Judges in chambers.

I presented evidence to Justices Kirby and Hayden on the 14^TH Mar 03, showing the detrimental ramifications of the Justice Gleeson and previous High Court rulings of 96, 98 and 2001-3.

If Justice Kirby’s and Haydens’ reasoning powers were of average dependability then they should have Reasoned that the unjust outcomes resulting from the previous Rulings proves the High Court Rulings were wrong, were corrupt and were insane. They have Obstructed and Perverted the "Means" of financing a Major Fusion Project in Australia with international involvement. They have Obstructed and Perverted Australias’ "Means" to move to the Forefront in Space Technology and Energy production and can be costing Australia vast sums of monies long term. The High Court Judiciary have worked their Arses off for 7 years so as to be losers, corrupt, incompetent and criminally insane. My subjecting Australia, by subjecting it’s representatives, their Politicians to the ramifications of their set of Dividing and Multiplying by Zero is credible, is legal and it’s legitimate that it goes before the full Bench of the High Court and is upheld. The State, Corporations, Business,

Tax and citizens are subject to arithmetic, subject to the States official adding and multiplication etc.. The High Court are to subject the State and all citizens to their Arithmetic, and also multiplication by Zero whether they the Judiciary like it or not. The High Court Judiciary have committed criminal acts by refusing to do so.

The application of Algebra is not a legal act because Algebra is proven to be a flawed and defective Mathematics. So too is Dividing by Zero for it is stated you cannot divide by Zero and calculators return an error response. But calculators, computers, Mathematicians and the Education establishment accept 1(or anything) multiplied by Zero = Zero as true and correct. Therefore my political and legal application of Multiplying by zero is true, correct and legitimate. The Courts and Judiciary are to enforce the States multiplication by zero but have made a political decision not to and to discard the Evidence, discard the Truth, the Whole Truth and to discard Reasoning. The Court is to put these Silent and Hiding Mathematicians into the witness box under oath so I can force them to expose their non existent proof of their set of Dividing and Multiplication by Zero to the Court and the public; so exposing theirs as false.

The Gaul of Justice Micheal Kirby to go about the World inflicting his speeches and lectures upon us all when he has been proven, by me, to be of low intelligence and with abject reasoning powers. Kirby has had 3 chances to comprehend the credibility and legitimacy of my petition to the High Court acting as the Court of Disputed returns. In 1996 he referred my Petition to the then Chief Justice Brennan who made the criminally insane ruling that the High Court doesn’t have Jurisdiction to apply the Laws of Mathematics or Physics. Justice Brennan knew he had made a false statement, but knows he and the Judiciary are above the law. My Petition was referred to a Judge in chambers in 1998, to Justice Kirby in chambers, but he ignored it so confirming, adopting and implementing Justice Brennans ruling of 1996. And on the 14^th of Mar 2003 he again presided with Justice Haydon over my Appealing of Justice Gleasons’ ruling that my Petition was unintelligible. The 3 Judges know they made a blatantly false statement, a Perjurous statement which was intended to, and did and continues to Obstruct and Pervert the course of Justice. Kirby and Haydon by upholding of that criminally insane ruling became guilty as well. And it proves the Judiciary are unanswerable and above the law.

Gleason, Kirby and Haydon and the High Court are refusing to acknowledge and accept what has been proven and that is that the Universes’ laws, its’ laws of Mathematics and Physics, are the foundations of everything; so obviously and undoubtedly the foundations of all the Words of Legislation and the Constitution. This makes my Petitions of 1996, 98, 2001-3 credible and Legal. It also exposes the Judiciary as unfit to establish, to perceive, to understand nor to make rulings relative to the Truth, the Whole Truth. As I stated loud and clear in my Appeal of the 14^th Mar 2003 the High Court of Australia is Bankrupt and is proven to be Criminally insane.

We all are subject to the application of Arithmetic personally and legally. 2 plus 2 = 4 and 2 multiplied by 2 = 4 are specific with a very limited application. If applied as equaling 3 or 5 then police and courts become involved to enforce 2 plus 2 = 4 and 2 multiplied by 2 = 4. This proves the Judicial Court system can and do legally apply addition and the quicker means of addition, known as multiplication, of any number which proves they can and are to also apply addition and multiplication by zero. But multiplication by Zero = 0 is unrestricted and can be applied at any time, anywhere, to everything by anyone; but only to those failing to declare the antidote: 1 multiplied by zero = 1 a non-action. Any and all other barriers to my subjecting the Political Establishment to their multiplying by zero = 0 can immediately be rendered non-existent. The Judiciary are criminally and politically refusing to enforce this Truth, this Whole Truth and Law.

I am left with having to bring large law suits against 12 Judiciary, 5 Judges of the Supreme Court and 7 Judges of the High Court of Australia that reflects the seriousness of their crimes and the economic, my personal and Australia-Worlds’ scientific and financial losses. These losses continue to grow due to their Obstruction of Justice. So I am justifiably bringing a $5 to 10 Billion dollar lawsuit against them. If this was America I’d make it $100 Billion.

The State and the Judiciary and the Words of Legislation are not to commit criminal acts when implementing Words of Legislation and when it does then it renders those Words of Legislation not credible, not lawful and not enforceable. For example, evidence acquired unlawfully or criminally is inadmissible as evidence. The ABCs’ Notice of Motion of the 11^th April, and the Judiciary of the Supreme Court, committed the Crime of Perjury. They also Obstructed and Perverted the Course of Justice with the discarding of the evidence, discarding of the Truth, the Whole Truth and abandoning of Reasoning with the criminal act of Supplanting of the Words and numbers of Legislation that are not applicable to the situation.

There was only my Action for Damages to bring before the Court subject to my prerogative within the following 3 years, expiring 29^th Aug. 2005. So obviously on the 11^th April 2003 a Perjured "Notice of Motion" was issued against me with Judicial collusion taking place with the ABCs costs criminally and unjustifiably awarded against me.

Also: Another corrupt and perjured "Notice of Motion" was issued for a Court hearing on the 24^th July 2003:

Their CRIMINAL SHIT are just words and numbers that are irrelevant to my plagiarism case against the ABC and my Appeal. An Affidavit proving my Appeal was Justified was ignored, was Bulldozed aside so as to criminally supplant Words and Numbers of Legislation upon me so as to alter the outcome. They have discarded reality and sane reasoning with the sole criminal intent and act of supplanting of their criminal words and numbers vomit as the law, as justice but it isn’t. The Judiciary, the ABC and its’ Lawyers are guilty of colluding in the Obstructing and Perverting of the Course of Justice. The corrupt and criminally insane Judiciary of the Supreme Court, Judges Higgins CJ, Gray and Whittlam JJ. have criminally and unjustifiably disallowed my appeal. This justifies my massive Law suit against the 12 Judiciary.

Senators Charles Shumer Democrat and Jeff Sessions Republican appeared on the U.S. Newshour program in early Sept 03. Bill Pryor is one of President Bushs’ judicial nominees, and according to U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions Rep., stands for Truth and Law regardless of political consequences and he is known as a man of integrity. President Bush is entitled to appoint judges who follow the Law, not make the law, according to Senator Jeff Sessions and he thinks it’s time for some SANITY in the Courts and that’s what the Bush nominees stand for.

But Bill Pryor, judicial nominee, does regard and respond to political consequences and is politically motivated, and so too are all Judiciary, because they all separate Law from Justice by discarding Justice and Reasoning with their "Supplanting" of Words of Legislation.

The statement "President Bush is entitled to appoint judges who follow the Law, not make the Law" is a declaration Judiciary are not to reason; they are to pretend to reason and deceive the public that they are reasoning but INSANELY they are not. To reason is to apply the AMORAL foundations of reasoning which is to put the "Facts into their true perspective, relative to the phenomena" which is contrary to the criminally blind supplanting of Words and Numbers of Legislation that is prejudiced, corrupt and a stacked deck, marked cards and the taking of the pool win or lose, example ROUT v ABC.and the High Court 1996,98, 2001-2-3 This’s Law and Justice divided. And being Divided the Political and Judicial legal systems will fall.

U.S. Judicial nominee Bill Pryor, and all Judiciary, cannot be persons of Integrity for they cannot stand for Truth and Law unless Law and Justice are one and the same. This would require the US Judicial Court legal system to stand for, and implement, rulings that are Relative to the Truth. Instead rulings are criminally subjugated to being Relative to the criminal act of Supplanting of Words of Legislation. That results in the inevitable discarding of Truth, Reasoning and Justice. Consequently all Judiciary are not persons of Integrity, for if they were, they "NOW" cannot accept and be a functioning integral part, as they are, of the Criminal Insanity of their Judicial Court legal System. To discard the Truth is to be criminal and to discard Reasoning is to be insane. US Senator Jeff Sessions, on the US Newshour, said he thinks it’s time for some SANITY in the Courts and that’s what the Bush nominees stand for. This reveals US Senator Jeff Sessions Republican is Mad for his and all U.S. Judiciarys’ reasoning powers are in question and should be of serious concern!

Senator Charles Shumer Dem. used the questioning of the reasoning powers of the Judicial nominees to justify his and the US Senates’ disapproval by their not voting for 4 of the 149 Bush judicial nominees. So the US Senate and Senator Shumer Dem. recognise and are unknowingly agreeing with me that Judiciary and their Rulings are unfit relative to their incompetent, corrupt and abject, criminally insane Reasoning Powers.

It was Senator Charles Shumer Dem. questioning the reasoning powers of the Judicial nominees that stimulated Jeff Sessions Rep. to unknowingly relate, so concede, the reasoning of Judiciary of the US Legal system has always been insane by his statement "It’s time for some Sanity in the Courts."

Media tycoon and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, is under attack for making truthful statements that condemns all of Italy’s judges as being mad, reported in the Media 6^th Sept 03.

Silvio Berlusconi who is also President of the European Union’s council of Ministers to a British Conservative MP Boris Johnson, Editor of The Spectator: "These Judges are mad twice over. First because they are politically that way and second because they are mad anyway. To do that job you need to be mentally disturbed, you need psychic disturbances…that is why I am in the process of reforming everything."

Judiciary criminally supplant Words of legislation and discard the Truth, the Whole Truth and Reasoning and this proves all Judiciary are acting politically, and not impartially, and are criminally insane. Silvio Berlusconi has been remarkably truthful.

Leading members of Italys’ judiciary were incensed after Mr Berlusconi said in an interview that all Italian judges were "mentally disturbed". Quotes and references I have made are from the Australian Newspaper of 6^th Sept 03, by Richard Owen of The Times U.K..

I have already proven what Silvio Berlusconi is saying is true by my proving that Judiciary in Australia and Worldwide are criminally insane, I have supplied the evidence that proves it. The Italian Judiciary, as do all Judiciary, fail to realise it is mandatory that they, for in being for the Truth, the Whole Truth, must acknowledge and accept publicly Berlusconis’ truths that they are mentally deranged, and not wallow in their criminal hypocrisy by denying it.

It is more than coincidence that America and the U.K. who waged War on Iraq held 70% of Iraqs’ oil reserves prior to Saddam and its’ nationalisation. American interests held 25% and U.K. interests held 45% making it a total of 70%. The U.S. and the U.K. were not impartial.

French interests owned 25% and Iraq held the remaining 5% and 100% of Iraqs’ sand which Justified Iraq nationalising its’ oil reserves which are the 2^nd largest oil reserves in the world.

The US 100% privatisation of Iraqs' oil reserves and public assets is a massive crime against the Iraqi public and the poor. The citizens and the poor become more and more powerless and helpless; it’s the way the Rich and Powerful love it.

This proves the importance of public ownership and control of public assets independent of the State. Public ownership and control of Telstra independent of Aust. Governments is seriously important.

Justification and its’ importance was brought to the fore on the World stage by Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary General, stating publicly the threat to world peace and stability also to the future existence of the United Nations because of the United States and its’ Coalitions’ pre-emptive strike policy. He states it will stimulate countries to wage military attacks with or without justification.

This will fulfill the "One Law for One World" written in the judgement of the U.K. Magistrate who ordered the arrest of General Augusto Pinochet, former Chilean Dictator, for crimes of torture and conspiracy on behalf of Spain. A Micheal Tigar, Prof. of Law, referred to "One Law for One World" as an idea about the right of protection for all people.

11th July 2005: We are informed in June 2005 Mark Felt, Deputy Head of the F.B.I. at the time, was Deep Throat! But I'm not convinced because Henry Kissinger is still alive and I still consider he is the real Deep Throat. I've taken a calculated punt and if I'm wrong then I'm wrong, but I still think I am correct. I was surprised to find that Mark Felt had a deep voice and if that in fact is how the code name was chosen then Henry Kissinger has a far deeper voice than Mark Felt and that would fit that Henry Kissinger is the Real Deep DEEP THROAT who colluded with Mark Felt who met clandestinely with the Washington Posts' Woodward, rather than Kissinger. It was a simple task for Kissinger to have Mark Felt meet with Woodward while he, Kissinger was known publicly to be out of America. I intend to re evaluate my reasoning on this matter but I will state that I consider DEEP THROAT was close to Pres. Nixon and Mark Felt wasn't, whereas Henry Kissinger was. My conclusion was based on more than Kissinger's Deep Voice. I consider his position, character and behaviour fulfills the profile of  the real "Deep Throat". We can't be sure who the real DEEP THROAT was until 5 years after the death of all the suspects including the real DEEP THROAT. Mark Felt's public confession doesn't prove he was the real Deep Throat, but can be considered he was secretly in league with Kissinger and his identity was to be covered up so as to maintain the identity of the real DEEP THROAT secret until 5 years after his or her death. I'll concede I'm wrong when Henry Kissinger has been dead for more than 5 years. Kissinger to have been involved with Nixon over Watergate meant Kissinger had to commit criminal acts against the U.S.. Kissinger committed gross crimes against humanity for the U.S. and Pres. Nixon but I consider Henry Kissinger wasn't about committing crimes against America for Pres. Nixon and, I suspect, he set about to prevent his implication by working with Mark Felt as insurance against him being indicted along with Nixon over Watergate. Henry Kissinger has said, publicly, Nixon was a crook!       

Chritopher Hitchens in his 2001 Book "The Trial of Henry Kissinger", that I am presently reading following having watched the Tv. documentary of the same name has nothing to do with Watergate nor contributed to my conclusion Henry Kissinger is "Deep Throat" but has revealed an insight into Kissingers character and behaviour that I think is consistent with my conclusion. Christopher Hitchens has supplied the evidence that Henry Kissinger does have a case to answer over of his involvement in crimes against humanity and his implication in General Pinochets' military coup over Chile’s President Allende while working with President Nixon and the C.I.A.

Chiles’ President Allende had stated he would nationalise Chiles’ Copper industry but was overthrown and killed before he did, and was followed by a 17 year reign of State Terrorism against the Chilean citizenry. Chiles’ copper reserves were the largest in the world; Iraq did nationalise their oil reserves, prior to Saddam, which also suffered a like result, was overthrown and the countries resource assets were stolen back.

My Fusion Spacecraft Rocket engine and reactor designed to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms and to maintain a controlled and sustained fusion reaction by "altering and controlling of the speed of light up and down" (My Theory in 1992 and proven by me in 1998) to produce energy and replace fossil fuels which is my resource that the Rich and Powerful are stealing. They have stolen an 11 year march. This is assisted by the 12 judiciary ruling criminally and deliberately in favour of the Rich and Powerful so assisting in the stealing of my fusion technology that I gave 90% ownership and control of to the public worldwide. America's McCarthyism is alive and well in Australia and this world to this day for it didn't die in 1957 along with Joe McCarthy. 

Theodore J. Rout…..1st November 2003

My Appeal and the 2 Letters to the Supreme Court judiciary re the 24th July 03 hearing are on the main Webpage index.