IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA,
A.C.T. OFFICE OF THE REGISTRY No: 2002
In the matter of an application by
Theodore J. Rout
For leave to issue a proceeding.
EXPARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO ISSUE A PROCEEDING
GROUNDS:
Affirmed on 8th January 2002
Dated the 8th day of January 2002
Signed: Theodore J. Rout
THE APPLICANTS ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IS:
Theodore J. rout, 21/a Currong Flats, Currong St. Braddon, A.C.T. 2612
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA, ACTING AS THE COURT OF DISPUTED RETURNS, CANBERRA OFFICE OF THE REGISTRY No of 2002
In the matter of an application by Theodore J. Rout for leave to issue a proceeding.
AFFIDAVIT
My petition states very clearly that the High court acting as the court of disputed returns is being called upon to enforce its' ruling of 1996 by its' Justice Brennan that the "High court doesn't have jurisdiction to apply the laws of mathematics and physics". I, citizen demand the High court be honourable and "HONOUR" its' ruling and apply it to Bob McMullan the candidate for Frazer in the A.C.T., apply it to the Federal electoral commission and apply it to the High court and its' judiciary and its' staff and upon anyone else involved. To refuse or fail to do so is to be in contempt of the High court of Australia and the Commonwealth. Justice Callinan is in contempt of that High court ruling by not complying with it but he is flagrantly violating it.
To demand the High court honour and enforce its' ruling of 1996 by Justice Brennan is not trivial, not frivolous, not vexatious and not an abuse of the High courts' processes. But it's a criminal act for any High court judge to refuse to allow my petition to go before the full bench of the High court, acting as the court of disputed returns, for it to enforce or overturn its' 1996 Brennan ruling.
Justice Callinan can not reject legally nor honourably my petition, but his doing so is to bring the High court of Australia into disrepute. An honourable court has to honour its' rulings whether they like it or not. To refuse to do so, and fail to subject themselves to it as well, is an obvious crime. The High court either enforces its' Justice Brennans' ruling of 1996, confirmed by Justice Kirby in 1998, by him ignoring it, and also subjects the High court itself, its' staff and Judiciary to it, "NOW" or shreds it by my petition being heard by the full bench of the High court. Refusal to do so is a declaration by the High court of Australia that it is DISHONOURABLE, CORRUPT also INTELLECTUALLY AND ETHICALLY BANKRUPT. And criminally denying me, consequently any Australian citizen when the High courts' political whims dictate, access to the courts. I say it requires liquidators to be sent in and wind it up and shut the High court down.
Companies, to name a few, H.I.H, Intel and Enron, the U.Ss' 8th largest, went bankrupt, went broke and they ceased to exist as a result of decisions, wrong decisions and the High court of Australia is not immune for it too has gone bankrupt. High court Judiciary have inflicted their intellectual and unethical bankruptcy on Australia, upon its' people and me. Large numbers of people can say it's due to the long history of political appointment of judiciary; but replacing judiciary from the corrupt and incompetent Australian legal system and legal education system won't work. Indonesia to solve its' rampant, endemic Judicial corruption was thinking of sacking all of its' Judiciary and train new young individuals. Australian Judicial corruption and incompetence can be seen with my many attempts to resolve legal, scientific and political problems. The legal system doesn't work and the Judiciary and lawyers actually work to destroy it and destroy it they have. The 1996 ruling by Chief Justice Brennan has sent the High court bankrupt with the corrupt and incompetent help of Justice Kirby in 1998 and now with Justice Callinan 2002. Justice Brennan appears to have fled the country for Majorca Spain as did Christopher Skase.
These pathetic intellectual and unethical decisions by judiciary of the High court has continued with Justice Callinan. Like the Justice Brennan ruling being unfit to appeal so too Justice Callinans'. I will be applying section 72 of the Australian constitution for Callinans' removal from the High court bench on the grounds of mental incapacitation, improper conduct by bringing the High court into disrepute for Justice Callinan is PROVEN to be bringing the High court into disrepute by refusing to allow the High court, the full bench, to enforce or shred the High courts' 1996 DISGUSTING ruling by Justice Brennan. He, Callinan is giving credibility and legality to Brennans' 1996 ruling, that was confirmed by Justice Kirby in 1998, by his ignoring it, and is criminally subjecting me and only me to it when it has to be imposed upon everyone including the High court itself and its' Judiciary. But he, Callinan, doesn't respect it and subject himself and the High court to it for he has contemptuously, illegally and blatantly applied jurisdiction over the laws of maths and physics, for he has counted, by exercising jurisdiction over the rules of the High court. He can't legally count but yet he contemptuously and offensively, with gay abandon, states his decision to reject my petition is made pursuant to Order 58 rule 4(3), so he has counted. If Callinan and other judges want to regain jurisdiction to apply the laws of maths and physics, hence count, and regain jurisdiction to apply the rules of the High court and the Australian constitution then my petition must go before the full bench of the High court and be resolved.
I became aware more than 20 years ago that dictionaries and the phenomena of the real world were irrelevant in the interpretation of family law and all other legislation. I realized words of legislation mean whatever government servants and Judiciary want it to mean. My petition is rejected on the grounds its' frivolous, vexatious and/or an abuse of the court processes. Justice Callinan has proven nothing, supplied no proof whatsoever to justify, to prove his obviously criminal incompetent and politically biased decision. My petition already proves and states very clearly it isn't frivolous, isn't vexatious and isn't an abuse of the courts' processes.
All the judiciary of the High court have been politically appointed and have allegiances to 1 or other political party so will rule to support the State and their political parties. There isn't one judge on the bench that is supportive of the public exercising power. To support the public and me exercising power requires them to apply the statement "facts in their true perspective". I've been up against a stacked deck since1996 and a fully stacked bench faces me in 2002.
What I have horrifyingly realized on Jan 4th 2002, and all Australians should be utterly horrified as well, is to the reality that Justice Callinan and Judiciary and government servants interpret what I and people have written and said to mean whatever they want it all to mean; they don't just do it to legislation. Whereas what I write and say is to be interpreted according to the dictionary and the phenomena via the statement "facts' in their true perspective".
The horror gets worse for the Judiciary can't understand what I have written or say due to their interpreting what I or anyone else write or say to mean whatever they want it to mean.
Courts are about, or rather are supposed to be about, resolution of legal problems that are unable to be resolved out of court and since that is what I'm am doing then my petition is not an abuse of the court processes. My petition exposes and will resolve innumerable legal, scientific, economic and social problems and that proves beyond doubt that my petition is not frivolous. Bob McMullan is mine and North Canberrans' bullshit political representative, he and others including Kate Lundy and Margaret Reid have had years to face up to and to deal with this entire matter, but they choose not to. It shows the political system of the "Is' HAVE IT" doesn't work either. Consequently I have chosen to deal with this problem this appropriate way and this is my right to do so and I can assure the court this is the only way.
Can the High court think of a better way to deal with our bullshit political representatives than to cause all their votes to cease to exist and the arrogant, egotistical and testicleless, up themselves, physicists, mathematicians, Vice Chancellors and Universities internationally to have to front up publicly because of my High court petition and have them accept and confess publicly they had stupidly accepted the arbitrary proof, via the incompetent, criminal and unscientific "Is' HAVE IT" of their few wrongly declaring their dividing and multiplying by zero as correct 1200 years ago? No the High court can't. They didn't prove it 1200 years ago and can't prove it now nor prove it at anytime in the future but they have wrongly imposed it upon the public, their children and education systems as fact, imposed it as having been proven. My petition is to force the issue and to reject it is to obstruct and pervert the course of justice. I have proven my dividing and multiplying by zero is absolutely correct, beyond doubt, therefore "THEIRS IS WRONG".
Arithmetic confuses the majority of human brains. So it can be seen I have a big problem in getting the population to understand and accept my dividing and multiplying by zero. I have received only obstructionism from the scientific establishment. I have to explain my proof in non mathematical terms to the public and I strive and strain to do just that by applying the statement "facts in their true perspective" relative to the phenomena itself.
Their incorrect dividing and multiplying by zero doesn't allow an object to exist on nothing, but mine does. An object floating about in weightlessness in a spacecraft is on nothing, its not on 1 table, not on 1 anything, its on nothing therefore can be multiplied by zero and not by 1, with devastating ramifications for their incorrect dividing and multiply by zero, for I have proven things can exist on nothing. So multiply the object existing on nothing and Bob McMullans' votes by 0 and the answer is 0 votes and 0 object according to their incorrect dividing and multiplying by zero that Bob McMullan is subject to.
As well its' a violation of our human right to deny us multiplying by what ever we want to, it's our prerogative, and that includes multiplying by zero to arrive at the correct number of objects. We can multiply objects by whatever we want to, by 1 table, 2 shelves, or 3 of this or that or 5 of anything or whatever, but the dumb mathematicians and the High court judges, that have got shit for brains, are stopping us from multiplying by zero, for if we do we get the wrong answer. This violation of human rights can be associated with the bibles' garden of Eden. You can eat the fruits of any and all the trees but you can't eat of the tree of zero for if you do all hell will break loose and you that do will be damned.
For Justice Callinan or any other judge to think or say this is all trivia, frivolous or vexatious doesn't deserve to sit on any court bench. He must think that it is an abuse of the courts processes for this should have been dealt with out of court by mathematicians, scientists and politicians and not by the High court. But it is they and the politicians that are responsible for it ending up before the High court; not me. The High court has to deal with it because the weak minded physicists, mathematiciams, and political representatives haven't the got balls to do so; THEY HAVE TO BE FORCED .As well it's a circular problem for the legal system doesn't work therefore they responsible out of court won't deal with it because they know the courts don't work so know the courts won't deal with it which proves the legal system don't work and has to be replaced.
I am called upon to draft an affidavit in which, the High court demands, "I state the truth, the whole truth", I state the "facts in their true perspective". But the High court and its' Judiciary aren't responding to the truth supplied. The intellectual and ethical bankruptcy of the High court and legal system is seen by their reasoning, decisions and rulings not being subject to the same demands, being subject to the "facts in their true perspective" subject to "the truth, the whole truth". As well their "ABUSE OF POWER" is seen by the simple fact if I don't comply my petition will not be accepted, it will be unethically and criminally rejected. This reveals there is one law for us powerless citizens and another law for those of the State.
For Judiciary and government servants to interpret what is given under oath to mean whatever they want it to mean is to pervert the evidence and commit perjury. This is a common practice.
If we live under a democracy which is supposed to be power to the people, that is: "rule by the people, for the people, and of the people" then how come I and all us citizens are so powerless. It's because democracy is a camouflaged oligarchy which is rule by the few for the few. The State doesn't want people to exercise power and that is what I am endeavoring to do regarding this petition and my intellectual and scientific data. So it is imperative that I win over this bankrupt High court and its' political, legal and scientific systems and its' corrupt and incompetent system of the "Is' HAVE IT".
The PEOPLE will only ever have and exercise power when all legislation, judiciary and governments are subject to the statement "facts in their true perspective".
If the political and legal system and its' High court were fit to rule then the 1st thing, regarding my dividing and multiplying by zero, was to demand from the States' mathematicians and physicists absolute proof that their dividing and multiplying by zero was true and correct and they don't dare put up any of their algebra crap nor dare hide behind their tertiary playschool labels, position status nor money and definitely not behind mathematical plausibility. But the State and all its' resources lay idle and protected from reality for 8 1/2 years. Not one mathematician could have been been called upon for not one has emerged and supplied their proofs, not one; but I have had their A.S.I.O. and Federal police working in conjunction with each other spending a lot of money, time and energy yapping and snapping at my heels for 15 to 20 years to thwart and to silence me to the exceeding detriment of Australia and this world.
The decision regarding my petition is historical. The judicial, political and scientific criminal obstructionism of my petition, my work and achievements will finally be exposed publicly and I'll not spare any of them from the public contempt they deserve and all will have earned.
Upon the High court accepting and declaring it has, and we all have, jurisdiction to apply the laws of mathematics and physics then it will automatically be called upon to apply the incorrect dividing by zero to those subject to it: Bob McMullan the candidate for Fraser.
I repeat; rejection of my petition is a declaration by the High court of Australia that it is corrupt, dishonourable also intellectually and ethically bankrupt.
Date 8th Jan 2002
APPLICANT:. Theodore J. Rout
21/a Currong Flats, Currong St. Braddon, A.C.T. 2612....
IN THE PRESENCE OF
Signed .. witness .
Occupation .. Address