IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA,

CANBERRA OFFICE OF THE REGISTRY No C4 of 2002

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY

THEODORE J. ROUT : applicant

FOR LEAVE TO ISSUE A PROCEEDING.

                         APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

Grounds

21/a Currong Flats, Currong St.

Braddon, A.C.T. 2612

                                                                     [i]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA,

CANBERRA OFFICE OF THE REGISTRY No C4 of 2002

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY

THEODORE J. ROUT: applicant

FOR LEAVE TO ISSUE A PROCEEDING.

PART I: The rulings rejecting my 1996 Petition by Chief Justice Brennan, 1998 Petition by Justice Kirby, 2001-2 Petition by Justice Callinan and Petition/Exparte application by Chief Justice Murray Gleeson are void of intellectual merit, scientific worth or legal credibility. I believe and I know all the Judiciary involved know that adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying(by zero) and counting is the law but all have knowingly, deliberately and politically, so criminally,, have acted as though it isn't the law to accommodate the political establishment; for they all realise that to rule in my favour and remove 1 politician Bob McMullan then I've got all of the political establishment Federal and State.

Persons can't be prosecuted nor convicted for false accounting if adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying(by zero) and counting isn't the law.

PART 11: The dividing and multiplying by zero non-exclusive copyright is to finance a major Fusion rocket engine/reactor(to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms) project in Australia that would bring Australia to the forefront in space technology and solve the greenhouse effect and the energy problem. 10 years ago I applied for a "National Interest Grant", because my technology was in the National Interest, which was refused so resulted in all of my intellectual data, under nonexclusive copyright being, over 10 years, fed out of the country to Russia, China, France, U.K., U.S.A. and many, many others. Non-exclusive copyright data has to be disseminated worldwide for all to use, so I can be paid $copyrights. A.S.I.O. in conjunction with the Federal police didn't like it, they attempted to kill me, threatened to kill my daughter, harassed me for years and years attempting to silence me, leave me with nothing, which shows they knew my work was of enormous value. Australia had its' chances and blew it again and again. Australia, wanted everything from me for nothing, but has suffered enormous losses and the ridiculous political, economic, legal and scientific establishments and the media still haven't learnt their lessons.

And absurdly the Judiciary of the High Court, I believe, are criminally protecting all of them, all these losers to the extreme detriment of Australia scientifically, economically etc. etc..

PART 111: It is important for the Judiciary and the public to understand that the incorrect set of dividing and multiplying by zero doesn't allow an object to exist on "nothing", it DEMANDS everything has to exist on 1 table or on 1 something. Therefore the Earth being on "NOTHING", isn't supposed to exist because it isn't on 1 table or on 1 anything, sac is nothing. Well the Earth does exist and only my set of dividing and multiplying by zero allows it to exist on "nothing". The "Earth" multiplied by "Nothing" = exists or doesn't exist? Choose, and in choosing whether the Earth remains in existence or not decides which set of dividing and multiplying by zero is correct. Obviously my set is correct, it's as simple as that

If the High Court Judiciary wrongly think that Bob McMullen's votes are in 1 box on 1 table or on I something therefore his votes can't be on "NOTHING" then they need to think again. The box or computer containing his votes are on a table that's on the floor that's in a building that's

on the earth and the Earth is on "NOTHING". Therefore everything is on "NOTHING" so according to the incorrect dividing and multiplying by zero Bob McMullen's votes don't exist.

A cup of coffee can be designated as being on a table at the same time ignore its' saucer and the table cloth. So Bob McMullen's votes can be designated as being on nothing and ignore everything else, because everything is relative to it's foundations and everything's foundation is "nothing". When doing an inventory one can use imaginary tables, use drawings of shelves, use anything including zero; what's paramount is the final tally, the final decision. I and everyone can multiply anything or everything by zero legally.

As well the Electoral commission lost it's jurisdiction to add, subtract, divide, multiply or to count relative to the 1996 ruling by Justice Brennan, affirmed in 1998 by Justice Kirby which was accepted by Federal parliament including Bob McMullen by their ignoring it when approached by me regarding this matter. They must have applied their incorrect multiplication by "0" for I got NOTHING back from them, "NOTHING". 1 multiplied by 0 = 0 which is

wrong 1 multiplied by 0 = 1 a non action is correct.

PART IV: Because what I am asking to be implemented is the law. If the Judiciary don't know it's the law then they all need to understand that it is.

PART V: This entire matter should have and could have been resolved out of court at any time over the last 9 years. Bob McMullen and the Federal parliament also could have resolved this matter from the 14th Dec 2001, even at this very moment, for they know about it, but they are confident the Judiciary of the High court will protect them from being subjected to the law. This matter is in the court because of them and their failing and betraying of Australia and it's voters and their children.

Bob McMullen should pay all the costs; he deserves to pay all the costs, my costs, and more.

PART VI: Petition of 14`h December 2001, Exparte application 8th Jan 2002 and/or attached

PART VII: Under the circumstances I will have to explain it all as simply and succinctly as possible.

Dated the 28^th day of March 2002

Signed: Theodore J. Rout

21/a Currong Flats, Currong St.

Braddon, A.C.T. 2612

                                                                       [iii]

Page 1:

The public has the right and requirement to know that all Judges and particularly Judges of the High Court are sane; know their reasoning is sound, and their rulings are JUST; are correct. This is determinable by their reasoning and rulings being subject to the simple statement "facts in their true perspective", case by case, day by day. This then requires Judges to present their reasoning for all to see, resulting in a constant assessment, and quick removal of Judiciary when required. This will also reveal and prevent corruption, prejudice and bias by Judiciary. This will also reveal and prevent the implementation of criminal insanity of Governments and their legislation by Judiciary and courts. Governments and Judiciary, historically have a very, very, very long criminal record of criminal insanity, corruption and mental incompetence which requires to be constantly and permanently monitored and contained. So all in all it's very little to ask and expect of the Judiciary and it will put them and the courts on side with the powerless and helpless public who desperately are in need of the means to exercise power.

All Australians, Businesses and politicians are subject legally to their adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying(by zero) and their counting. Adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying (by zero) and counting by any numbers, which includes zero, is the law. If it isn't the law then no court can convict businesses, persons or politicians for false accounting in their tax returns. Accounting transactions regarding votes has transpired between me and Bob McMullan, candidate for Fraser. He and all Federal politicians have accepted being subject to their incorrect dividing and multiplying by zero by default, by ignoring it, so accepting me multiplying their votes by zero knowing the consequences of their votes ceasing to exist. I don't have to ask them for permission, I gave them all a chance but I didn't have to, for I and anyone can just do it. We don't have to enter into any written or verbal agreements for we all can just do it, when and wherever and to whomever we want. The onus is upon persons, Banks, Businesses, politicians and Governments to nullify this power over them by stating, and able to prove, before the event, they accept my set of dividing and multiplying by zero. The problem is the Judiciary of the High Court of Australia are guilty of the crime of refusing to uphold the law that they took an oath to uphold, therefore they all must vacate the bench.

The High court Judiciary know they can't convict persons for false accounting if adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying(by zero) and counting wasn't the law. Judiciary who can't understand that adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying(by zero) and counting is the law then they are unfit to sit on the bench of any court and must be removed. Any Judge that knows it is the law but says and acts as though it isn't is criminally unfit to sit on any court bench and must be removed. I say the Judiciary of the High Court are doing just that, they know it is the law but are saying and acting as though adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying (by zero) and counting isn't the law, therefore by their own corruptly nonsensical and incompetent garbage rulings condemn themselves as criminally unfit to sit in judgement on anything.

It is important for the Judiciary and the public to understand that the incorrect set of dividing and multiplying by zero doesn't allow an object to exist on "nothing", it DEMANDS everything has to exist on 1 table or on 1 something. Therefore the Earth being on "NOTHING", isn't supposed to exist because it isn't on I table or on 1 anything, space is nothing. Well the Earth does exist and only my set of dividing and multiplying by zero allows it to exist on "nothing". The "Earth" multiplied by "Nothing" = exists or doesn't exist? Choose, and in choosing whether the Earth remains in existence or not decides which set of dividing and multiplying by zero is

 Page 2

correct. Obviously my set is correct, it's as simple as that.

If the High Court Judiciary wrongly think that Bob McMullen's votes are in 1 box on 1 table or on 1 something therefore his votes can't be on "NOTHING" then they need to think again. The box or computer containing his votes are on a table that's on the floor that's in a building that's on the earth and the Earth is on "NOTHING". Therefore everything is on "NOTHING" so according to the incorrect dividing and multiplying by zero Bob MCMullen'S votes don't exist.

A cup of coffee can be designated as being on a table at the same time ignore its' saucer and the table cloth. So Bob McMullen's votes can be designated as being on nothing and ignore everything else, because everything is relative to it's foundations and everything's foundation is "nothing". When doing an inventory one can use imaginary tables, use drawings of shelves, use anything including zero; what's paramount is the final tally, the final decision.

Everyone and I can multiply anything or everything by zero, it is our prerogative. All the legislation of Australia and this world is on "NOTHING". The public and I don't have to get permission, orally or in writing, for we can "just do it"; multiply any and everything by zero. Courts and the judiciary are to implement it, whether they like it or not, whether they agree or not. The Judiciary of the High Court of Australia have had the opportunity in 1996, 1998, 2001-2 to force the implementation of the correct dividing and multiplying by zero, so preventing and solving the conflict, thus forcing the exposure of the world's Mathematicians, Physicists and their incorrect Arithmetic and defective algebra; that is the law.

As well the Electoral commission lost it's jurisdiction to add, subtract, divide, multiply or to count relative to the 1996 ruling by Justice Brennan, affirmed in 1998 by Justice Kirby which was accepted by Federal parliament including Bob McMullen by their ignoring it when approached by me regarding this matter. They must have applied their incorrect multiplication by "0" for I got NOTHING back from them, "NOTHING".

Governments, the education system, academia, mathematicians and the science establishment have had 9 years to deal with and resolve this dividing and multiplying by zero conflict and understand it, also introduce into the education system lots of other profound scientific work of mine. But it all has been criminally ignored and they criminally continue to teach peoples' children what has been proven to be nonsense. They don't have the legal nor ethical right to do this, but they just continue to do it and the High Court Judiciary are aiding and abetting it.

All citizens are yet to realise their legal right to apply the power of the incorrect multiplying and dividing by zero and that they can apply it, make a lot of money, get rid of a lot of bills, and acquire a lot of goods and assets; for it is the law worldwide. Governments can be sued for wrongful arrest and wrongful conviction by the criminally unfit Judiciary.

Change always has had to be brought about by a person or persons outside the political, economic, legal and scientific systems. Changes by those within these systems is always about them feathering and furthering theirs and their friends own interests. Judges of the High court have had since 1996 to move forward and embrace change, but no they are opposing progress and problem solving to the detriment of Australia, its' citizens and me.

The ruling, regarding my Exparte application/Petition, handed down on Thursday 10 February 2002 by Chief Justice Gleeson is a unique ruling. It must be seen as historical and be recognized as a Freudian slip of his pen for he has broken the "Judicial code of silence" by putting it in writing "unintelligibility" was the grounds for rejecting my Petition to the High Court. My

Page 3

Exparte application has stressed Justice Gleeson to confess his and all judiciaries code of practice, since time began, of can't be bothered and/or not wanting to intellectually and/or politically to understand or act on the evidence before them. So they SILENTLY deem it all "unintelligible" and create a make believe ruling that persons are guilty, so jail and/or fine ordinary citizens and the poor, and/or dismiss their cases that are seeking justice and resolution of their legal problems. This is consistent with the unjust and incompetent conveyor belt Judicial justice system.

Chief Justice Gleesons' ruling reeks of elitism. I'm not of the college tie and I and the majority of the public can't afford a team of rambling, waffling mumbling Barristers and lawyers to act for us and pay them $obscene monies; nor do I speak with a plum in my mouth. What chance do I and the ordinary citizens, including those who stutter, have before these judiciary and their unstated rulings of its all unintelligible.

Justice Gleeson's ruling that broke the "Judicial code of silence" is a strong indication that he may be suffering a serious brain condition such as Alzheimer's disease. We the public require him to submit to medical tests to establish if he has Alzheimer's or some other horrible debilitating brain condition that causes everything to be "unintelligible". We the public can't rely on his fellow Judicial colleagues or politicians to compel him to have tests nor them to inform the public if Justice Gleeson is found to be suffering a terrible brain dysfunction. This is proven by the Judges of the Supreme court of N.S.W. and politicians maintaining, Judge Dr Evatt, ex-leader of the Federal labor Party, who was suffering Alzheimer's disease, on the bench and covering up this known fact to the detriment and ignorance of the public. Justice Dr Evatt was observed looking at photos upside down so obviously finding everything "unintelligible" like Chief Justice Gleeson.

All Australians should be extremely offended and should totally reject Chief Justice Gleeson of the High Court of Australia's' "unintelligible" ruling. To accept and/or ignore this despicable, elitist, anti man in the street, racist and extremely anti the uneducated, anti the illiterate, anti those with speech difficulties, anti the unintelligent, anti those who can't express themselves, anti those educated in public schools, anti the poor and deprived, anti those who can't speak English, anti those who are their own worst enemies when struggling to defend themselves against the Judiciaries own kind, the elitist rich Barristers and lawyers of an incompetent corrupt and obscene legal system; would be a crime against humanity.

This legal system isn't accessible to me nor to the Australian public therefore this decrepit rotten legal system must be replaced with one that does serve the ordinary citizen in the Street. They the Judiciary arrogantly think they are untouchable, unaccountable and unremoveable, just as have the arrogant fools of history.

My Petitions of 1996, 1998 and 2001-2 gave the Judiciary of the High Court of Australia a real privilege and fortunate opportunity to show Australia and the world what they were made of. They had the chance to demonstrate their reasoning powers when confronted with the most profound and significant legal case in Australia's legal history. Able to display their mental agility and their intellectual capacities and their bloodhound sense for justice, truth and sensibility. The Australian legal and Judicial system could have achieved world acclaim and international envy. A legal and Judicial system to be envied, revered and adopted. They have been given every possible chance to deliver the right verdict. But sadly NO. Australia's High Court deserves to become an international ICON of ridicule and Australian shame also be a public whipping post for Judiciary and lawyers to be lashed to.

It doesn't matter now if my petition does or doesn't go before the full bench of the High Court of Australia; other than to achieve having the full bench rule unanimously against my set of

Page 4:

dividing and multiplying by zero. I've had 6 rule against me already and another I or 2 should do it. The more ridiculous and absurd their corrupt and incompetent rulings the better. The Australian legal judicial system requires to be replaced, for it's unfit to exist in the 21st century and the High Court Judiciary have done a damn good job in proving this to be true; shown it just doesn't deliver and can't deliver the right decisions which is paramount. It's not the High Court, the Office nor the Judiciary, the man that counts but the decisions that are made that's important. The High Court Judiciary have naively and arrogantly failed to perceive this; it's amazing what immunity from accountability does to their egos and minds. The High Court Judiciary have shockingly failed to comprehend what the ramifications are for them by stupidly protecting political losers of Parliament and ridiculously protecting Mathematicians and Physicists that are wrong, who are going to capitulate, and will concede and accept that my set of dividing and multiplying by zero is correct. Also that I will go down in history as Australia's greatest scientist.

Reality stands on its' own and doesn't require to be stupidly propped up and suckled as does their incorrect and unproven set of dividing and multiplying by zero. It doesn't matter what evidence is supplied by me to the High Court Judiciary for their minds are criminally shut.

Einstein predicted the coming of a superior science where things are simple and beautiful. It can be seen that dividing and multiplying by zero is simple but complex in its' simplicity ............. The superior sciences' foundation is the single statement "facts in their true perspective" that accesses the infinite intelligence of the phenomena and it's inanimate intelligence (matter). Oppose it is to pervert the facts which begets stupidity, irrationality, corruption and the acquiring of a low intelligence. Now doesn't that describe well the Judiciary of the High Court of Australia?

I don't care how many ridiculous and corrupt Judiciary of the High Court rule against me for they too will be forced to accept reality, capitulate and accept along with the worlds' physicists, mathematicians and politicians what I have proven.

Bob McMullan, candidate for Frasers' defense will require him to call out his super heavy weight mathematicians, with their glass jaws that are fatally vulnerable to my set of dividing and multiplying by zero, and put up the proof their set of dividing and multiplying by zero is correct and mine is wrong (which they can't do) for all to see; not only for the full bench of the High Court. He and the rest of those of parliament have the responsibility to all of the Australian electorate to face and deal with this dividing and multiplying by zero problem, and a wealth of other scientific work by me. It is an obstruction of justice for the Judiciary of the High Court to "conspire" to allow Bob McMullen and those of Parliament not to be held accountable by rejecting my petition. They of Parliament have had years to deal with this matter and have failed to do so.

The High court knows they will need to rule in my favour if my Petition goes before the full bench. For they know the media blacklisting of me should collapse; media coverage should occur and public awareness should result. But the Judiciary and parliament don't want the public to know so they need to maintain the cover up, so they need to reject my petition.

Most Australians don't understand that Governor General Peter Hollingworth has to be sacked due to him having made the wrong decisions in the past. In having made the wrong

Page 5:

decisions he must not occupy a position where he makes decisions. To be the Governor General he is called upon to make decisions, but he has proven he is unfit to make decisions, therefore he must go. Likewise the High Court Judiciary have made the wrong decisions regarding my Petitions of 1996, 1998 and 2001-2002, so they, not only Governor General Peter Hollineworth must go, they too must be removed from the High Court bench as well.

Decision makers must not be given immunity from accountability nor permanent tenure. Their tenure is dependent upon making decisions, the right decisions and the High Court Judiciary have and continue to make the wrong decisions; therefore they must go. Not just Peter Hollingworth.

Simon Crean leader of the Federal Labor party has got it wrong when he says it's the Office of the Governor General that is important and needs protecting. The Labor Party hasn't learnt its' lesson for it was the decision by Governor General John Kerr to dismiss Gough Whitlam in 1975 that was of political and historic importance, not the man or office.

The implementation of my dividing and multiplying by zero and the copyright dollars is the financial means to fund a major fusion spacecraft rocket engine/reactor (designed to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms) project in Australia, with international involvement, that would bring Australia to the forefront in Space technology. But it's being criminally obstructed by Judiciary of the High court in 1996, 1998 and 2001-2, by the Federal Parliament losers, by the Media's criminal concept of "freedom of the press" to dump news and information that's in the Australian and world publics' interest into the garbage and "freedom of the press" to blacklist citizens and me. Also obstructed by BUM mathematicians, BUM physicists and a Bum Science establishment.

To fuse 4 hydrogen atoms requires to understand the concepts of "NOTHING". To understand that "NOTHING" exists in 4 forms and understanding dividing and multiplying by zero. Now I don't intend to go on A FOOLS ERRAND, to accommodate the fools of the High court, to fuse 4 hydrogen atoms and development a fusion spacecraft rocket Engine/reactor with computers that incorrectly divide and multiply by zero. The Australian science establishment is stupid and gutless enough to do just that so as not to admit their set of dividing and multiplying by zero and their computers are defective. They and Bob McMullan and the rest of those of Australian parliaments including the High Court Judiciary (1996,1998) betrayed and failed all Australians, who should be very angry and unforgiving, for the problem of dividing and multiplying by zero could have, and should have, been resolved and fixed along with the fixing of the millenium bug in the year 2000.

The High Court Judiciary continue to obstruct the resolution of the problem of dividing and multiplying by zero and the correct set being implemented in the year 2002.

Think on it; how awful it must be to fill ones head with all that dreadful legislative crap. What an obscene treatment of a person's mind. What a crazy thing to do to your brain. They should litigate!

I relate information in simple terms but I refuse to explain things in baby talk to the High court. The full bench of the High court requires to sit and overturn the 1996 Justice Brennan ruling and state the High court, the public and I have jurisdiction to apply mathematics and physics or enforce it upon themselves and the entire political and economic establishment. Also overturn all the other crazy nonsense DECISIONS of 1998, 2001-2002.

Callinan's ruling also shows him as unintelligent and lacking the mental powers of perceiving the difference between trivia and complex data expressed in simple terms. He must still believe the stupid idea of 20 and more years ago that if you can't understand what a person is saying and writing then they must be highly intelligent. So because he can understand what I write and say then he must think I'm unintelligent, and what I state is stupid. Whereas by me causing him to understand these complex matters by expressing them in simple terms then that demonstrates I am highly intelligent, and what he thinks is stupid.

I have sought legal representation and found law firms have conflicts of interest by them having political parties and their members as clients. None will represent me nor litigate on my behalf due to these matters involving political parties and their political interests and what makes it worse it involves all the political parties including independent's political agendas. So it is exceedingly important for Law Firms to declare the political parties and party members they represent also what the political allegiances and aspirations of lawyers and Law firms are. Clients can be betrayed by Lawyers due to their lawyers political convictions and affiliations.

Judiciary preside in an evil position. It is evil to subject persons to an oath and not be subject

Page 7:

The High Court of Australia and the legal system have proven they are not intellectually nor ethically capable of dealing with Dividing and Multiplying b zero, that's to finance the Fusion rocket engine/reactor technology to solve the energy and greenhouse problem, Genetic engineering, Cloning, Embryonic stem cell technology, I.V.F., nor with the criminal importation of goods, manufactured overseas on the cheap in violation of Australia's wages and conditions, by Free Trade ... ... Neither is the Political system, nor the corrupt and insane Science establishment of the "Is' HAVE IT".

                                -----------------------------------------------

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA, CANBERRA OFFICE OF THE REGISTRY No.         of 2002

                        ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.

BETWEEN                                        THEODORE J. ROUT, appellant

AND

                                                           BOB McMULLAN , respondent

1. The appellant appeals pursuant to leave to appeal [                            ] of the judgement of Chief Justice Gleeson of the High court given on 14^th Feb 2002 dismissing my Petition/Exparte application of 2001-2.

Grounds 2.

 The High Court Judiciary are knowingly, deliberately, so criminally, refusing to acknowledge and implement the law. Rulings in 1996, 1998, 2001-2 are a declaration that the High Court of Australia is "corrupt, dishonourable and intellectually also ethically bankrupt". It has been confirmed by the most disgraceful ruling in Australian legal history, if not the world, and will bring disgust and shame upon the entire Australian and World legal establishments and was handed down on the14th February 2002 by the Chief Justice Gleeson.

My having proven the Earth is on "NOTHING", it isn't on 1 table or on 1 anything, proves everything is on "NOTHING" in turn proves everything is subject to its' foundations. All the legislation passed by Federal and State Parliaments is based upon adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying(by zero), counting and the laws of this universe, so consequently are the foundations, so are the law Australia-worldwide. Therefore all legislation including the Australian Constitution are subject to the laws of this Universe, are subject to adding, subtracting, dividing, multiplying(by zero) and counting and subject to the statement "facts in their true perspective" for it was proven by me to be a law of this Universe in January 1997, but not made public until now. I can't waste time waiting around for the science establishment.

The statement "facts in their true perspective" makes or breaks theories and laws therefore that makes the statement itself a law of this universe. This also makes it the means of applying the laws of this universe by all legislation worldwide being subject to it. Anyone and everyone not subject to it is above the law.

The conflict of dividing and multiplying by zero is the Government and High court's "legal" problem. Their Mathematicians have to be ordered to deal with it otherwise they can deal with it at their whim. So Governments and the High Court judiciary must stop passing the buck.

3. That my Petition goes before the full bench of the High Court of Australia, acting as the court of disputed returns, to have Bob McMullen removed from Federal parliament.

Theodore J. Rout 21/a Currong Flats, Currong Street, Braddon, A.C.T. 2612

To The Registrar of the High Court, Canberra A.C.T. AND TO: The Respondent: Bob McMullan, Electorate Office, Melbourne Building, 51 Northbourne Ave. Canberra City.

GO TO HOME PAGE